General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHas a Journalistic Entity announced
Which well regulated militia the latest child and teacher killer belonged to? If said child and teacher killer did not belong to a well regulated militia would that fact also be newsworthy? Would such criteria be relevant to anyone who murdered anyone while not a member of a well regulated militia? Are the murders of children and teachers necessary for the security of a free state?
SheltieLover
(60,355 posts)I'm sure we don't have to worry about msm or cable "news" asking such a "tough" question.
Maybe you could suggest it go some You Tube folks?
Irish_Dem
(59,744 posts)at their school desks with military grade weapons.
Everyone knows this because the Supreme Court and the GOP keep telling us
it is all written in the Constitution somewhere and can never ever be challenged or changed.
So all through the year we pay homage to our Founding Fathers by making their dream come true.
BOSSHOG
(40,283 posts)Now I know the truth about conservative orthodoxy and I am free.
Irish_Dem
(59,744 posts)The truth will set you free.
Blappy
(140 posts)because everyone with access to these weapons SHOULD be a part of some sort of group committed to mutual responsibility (call it a militia if you like), therefore impeding the individual who might perpetrate unregulated types of gun violence acts like mass shootings in schools. In all cases, such individuals need a 'society', to be an early warning for us all. Maybe it is okay, reasonable and even totally constitutional to require 5 or 6 others who know the individual, and are themselves in good societal standing, to vouch for those purchasing large capacity automatic weapons, or does society as a whole have a means to decide for themselves how to regulate the dangerous (mass killing) arms in their society.
I'm sure that stupider things have been suggested. Looking at you, Suckpreme Court