General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Dworkin Report: The Enormous Gaetz Report Scandal Hidden in Plain Sight
We won't let them bury it
Scott Dworkin
Dec 24, 2024
By now you might have seen the House Ethics report on Matt Gaetz was released yesterday. The details are beyond disturbingeven worse than we had imagined.
But the other scandal here is the fact that countless Republicans, like Mike Johnson and Kevin McCarthy, have covered up these allegations for years. I have no doubt that Donald Trump also knew about details outlined in the report, but he picked Gaetz to be the next Attorney General anyway.
Its an enormous scandal, and the corporate media needs to start acting like it. After the holidays, well make sure this gets the spotlight it deserves.
And let me be clear, none of this wouldve happened without our overwhelming public pressure. Several folks in Congress told me the same thing: if it werent for our pushback, Gaetz would still be the nominee, and the report wouldve never seen the light of day.
Our Watchdog Coalition led the charge. We made countless phone calls, and sent thousands of letters to Congress from constituents, demanding they oppose Gaetz and release the report.
/snip/
Merry Christmas Eve and happy holidays, no matter what you celebrate.
Onward!
Scott
/snip
He's right. The real scandal is the coverup that took place for years!
BoRaGard
(3,184 posts)Walleye
(36,439 posts)JCMach1
(28,148 posts)May sound like a modest proposal, but why didn't they just do their job?
sop
(11,600 posts)There were hundreds of posts here on DU predicting his imminent arrest and expulsion from the House. Everyone thought he was toast. No one thought he would survive. But, like the cockroach he is, Gaetz managed to stay alive.
Gaetz denied everything, expressed his outrage, blamed the "deep state," attacked his victims and all his political friends rallied around him. And nothing happened. It was all just swept under the rug by corporate media. This whole sordid mess just underscores the rot and corruption of our political and judicial systems.
Bluetus
(301 posts)If he chose to do his job. Garland decided you don't prosecute these things because voters will have an opportunity pass their own judgment. Of course, in this case, voters had no such opportunity because Gaetz decided not to run hoping that would be enough to keep the report secret.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #29)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
reACTIONary
(6,157 posts).. that crimes are not to be prosecuted so that the voters can decide for themselves. I don't think he explained why he didn't prosecute him at all, which would have been inappropriate.
The only reason Garland would not have prosecuted him would be because there would not have been sufficient evidence to do so, at the federal level.
You forgot the sarcasm flag.
reACTIONary
(6,157 posts)... That was decided by the professional prosecutors who were in charge of the investigation. Garland never said anything about "let the voters decide".
Bluetus
(301 posts)there was PLENTY of evidence to prosecute.
Response to reACTIONary (Reply #40)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
reACTIONary
(6,157 posts)... the professional, career prosecutors assigned to the case. If there was enough evidence and a reasonable probability of conviction, they would have recommended to prosecute him. The fact that they recommended otherwise shows that there wasn't.
This investigation was largely carried out by a Democratic administration under the direction of a Democratic AG. The final decision was made by that Democratic AG. I don't see how defending Democrats from bulllshit conspiracy theories can be considered "right wing talking points."
Response to reACTIONary (Reply #52)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
reACTIONary
(6,157 posts)... not to prosecute was made by the carrier professionals assigned to the case. That was reported at the time that the decision was made.
Have a happy holiday!
Response to reACTIONary (Reply #55)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #38)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to reACTIONary (Reply #37)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bluetus
(301 posts)I was talking about how Garland's actions are perceived. As you noted, there is absolutely no ambiguity about what Garland's actions said. They said he wanted no part of holding any politicians accountable for anything, at least no Republicans. The public gets that. They don't need a verbatim quote. They understand the meaning.
But Dems instinctively want to turn that obvious observation into a debate about precise citations. This is why so many people just can't vote for Dems anymore. At some level, we supposedly have a set of values that are honorable, but rather than making sure our talk and actions align with those principles, too often that just becomes empty rhetoric.
For 14 years, we have not had a functioning majority, but the public perceived us as being in charge for 12 of the past 16 years. Everyone here can play the Manchin or Sinema card to explain why we have not accomplished much real progress (and done a lot of backsliding in some areas). But the public no longer hears any coherent messages from the Dem Party, and they can't really judge us by our results, because that has been messy.
We will never have a functional majority until we have leaders who present a few big, bold ideas that connect with the public, and the party rallies around those ideas.
Explain it to me like I'm a 5th grader.Tell me what Democrats are willing to fight for today. Give me the three big bold ideas that the vast majority of Dem politicians will fight for. If we can't do that, then don't expect the public to vote for us.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #47)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bluetus
(301 posts)No small ideas. There are plenty of bureaucrats to take care of the small issues. The issue is to get elected so that we can direct the bureaucrats to deal with the smaller issues the right way.
But you can't win elections talking about minutia. Ted usually talked about very consequential, bedrock issues, and with a passion that earned him the title of "Lion of the Senate".
Bernie talks about a lot of the really important issues. Unfortunately, his age and accent (and an almost total lack of support from other Dems) kept Bernie from being as persuasive as he needed to be. Ted was much like Bernie, in that he was never afraid or apologetic to discuss the big issues. And Ted had a more ingratiating oratorical style.
It is a problem when the only ones we can name who can be compared with people like Ted are Bernie, Elizabeth, AOC and a couple of others. There are many other "progressives" who are fine, honorable, decent people, but they tend to react to the issue of the moment rather than advocating for the really important big issues, mostly connected with the systematic economic unfairness we have today.
We need to get a leader who will be out front on the issues that have Americans so angry they are willing to vote for a mobster, rapist, serial liar. We must not dismiss what Americans told us to our faces last month.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #49)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bluetus
(301 posts)Yes, if the election was rigged so cleverly in 10 states that a month later, we still have no evidence, that deserved to be examined closely.
But that is my point about big issues. Why did 70+ million Americans go there?
I put it to you that the Dem Party had clear values in the FDR and post-FDR years, and most of these were based on economic fairness. And we need to be honest that minorities did not receive their fair share of economic fairness, even with all the progress made under FDR. But the country had a clear direction, which was away from robber barons and monopolists and toward worker rights, affordable education, affordable health care, affordable housing, and so on.
Ask 100 people what Democrats stand for today and you will get mostly blank stares. Ask 100 people who bold plans for the future Democrats are fighting for -- crickets. This is a problem.
Trump says he is for beating down foreign competition, especially the Chinese. He says he is for getting rid of the brown people who are taking our jobs. He is in favor of annexing Greenland, Canada, Panama and ??? because dammit, we are the freaking USA and we can do what we want. He's in favor of ending the Ukraine war on day 1 and solving the Palestinian war later that same day. That's a plan. It is an insane plan, but what we should have learned, above all else, from this election is that an insane plan beats no plan every day of the week.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #51)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bluetus
(301 posts)We must insist on clean, accountable elections, where 100% of the votes have an auditable paper trail. That's one of the big issues, IMHO.
But there is no way 7 million votes were flipped and nobody noticed anything wrong. We lost this election because of our own mistakes, because we aren't speaking to the issues that cause 70% of Americans to say we are on the wrong track. And blaming that on election fraud without any evidence doesn't help our cause one bit. We need to address OUR issues.
Response to Bluetus (Reply #57)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
SheltieLover
(60,302 posts)magicarpet
(16,983 posts).... even if they are damn well near 40 years old. White male privilege permits and encourages this.
Irish_Dem
(59,741 posts)Many of them do the same thing, enjoy the drug and sex trafficking made available to them.
mopinko
(71,968 posts)he shelled out half his cong salary on sex. who knows how much on blow.
we dont talk enough about how rich these ppl get.
IbogaProject
(3,793 posts)Irish_Dem
(59,741 posts)And he most likely takes bribes.
Think. Again.
(19,120 posts)Or do they have any authority to act in any way (that they didn't do)?
Wounded Bear
(60,847 posts)and wait/hope for others to do whatever enforcement might be warranted.
Think. Again.
(19,120 posts)...that can also do reports but not do anything meaningful when they have evidence of criminality?
Or is that the same as the "Ethics" committee?
UTUSN
(72,720 posts)Kid Berwyn
(18,362 posts)As well as perverts who think exactly alike.
usaf-vet
(7,019 posts)P..... tapes? Or something equally threatening.
70sEraVet
(4,238 posts)Trump wants to accumulate corrupt people in his administration, so that they HAVE to obey him. The same thing Putin did with him!
Wounded Bear
(60,847 posts)a bunch of hedonistic assholes.
Kid Berwyn
(18,362 posts)Says it all, Al Capone.
NJCher
(38,241 posts)For a period of about eight years, the looney Coast Coast show had a guest who regularly appeared. I cant remember his name exactly, but it had Jordan in it.
This guest often seemed fearful, but he came on the show anyway to predict that criminals would take over the United States government. If I recall correctly, the guest had some credibility, having had some type of job where he was an assistant to someone high in the power structure.
Of course we all laughed.
Old Crank
(4,915 posts)After Christmas means then New Years. Any look means another fire hose of garbage from trump to distract the press. A dayly occurance. Every one with a GOP senator should be calling, emailing etc. about the scandal and the manure sacks that trump is pushing for his cabinet.
usonian
(14,636 posts)It really is golden!
Diraven
(1,094 posts)They're not disqualifying for Republican voters and the media has decided they're not newsworthy.
Silent Type
(7,342 posts)mgardener
(1,912 posts)That the, oh so moral, Elise Stefanik did nothing.
She is a sniveling, moral coward.
They all are.
SergeStorms
(19,339 posts)when it comes to the Big Orange Pig. She's a real fangirl.
Ocelot II
(121,505 posts)and chose Gaetz for AG anyhow. Or maybe he chose him because he knew the dirt would come out eventually, as a big ol' fuck you to everybody who cares about such things.
JCMach1
(28,148 posts)With no guardrails he can continue trolling as he pleases.
Pam Bondi is almost as big a troll as Gaetz.
rubbersole
(8,712 posts)Raiding the Treasury on page A-23, under the story about flying pigs...
Orrex
(64,330 posts)SergeStorms
(19,339 posts)for even the lowliest position in the Trump administration. It's required.
republianmushroom
(18,179 posts)These are the family values of republican politicians.
Chicagogrl1
(483 posts)I remember a time not too long ago when Howard Dean was prevented from moving on because he had a funny laugh. Now you can be a rapist, sexual assaulter, druggie, felon, liar, and still allowed to be in Congress, or even the president United States.WTAF???
Blue Owl
(54,921 posts)Kaleva
(38,544 posts)And it wasn't Republicans who prevented Dean from winning the primary
moondust
(20,518 posts)I saw a couple EU news channels last night that covered the Gaetz report. The reporters didn't say it but the vibe was "Can you believe this? Trump tried to appoint THIS guy to be the chief law enforcement officer of the U.S."
dchill
(40,769 posts)But what else is new? It's the only way they win.