General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat if the site name were changed to "radical left lunatics underground"?
Do we fit the bill?
Walleye
(36,439 posts)If somebody would give me a few examples of the radical left, it might clear things up.
thucythucy
(8,767 posts)the Spartacist League, and the Socialist Equality Party (formerly the Workers' League) as examples.
Also sub groups such as the Fourth Internationalist Tendency, which I think might still exist and was affliated with the SWP.
Then too there's the Communist Party USA, which I think also still exists.
There are others, but these come immediately to mind.
Walleye
(36,439 posts)At least that is the impression I get, because you never hear of them really doing anything. However, the radical right wing has now consumed the entire Republican party it seems.
thucythucy
(8,767 posts)They are all locked into the "both sides are the same" frame of thought. Democrats to them, no matter how progressive, are all tools of the bourgeoisie and running dog lackeys of American imperialism.
If any of them claim to be Democrats it's only for the purpose of trying to infiltrate or co-opt us.
Back in the 1930s and '40s groups like these were very much larger, and more influential, and actually did some good work. The CPUSA for instance took the lead in defending "the Scottsboro Boys" from being murdered for a crime they obviously didn't commit, and the SWP in the 60s did some antiwar organizing that was helpful to the overall cause. But the Hitler-Stalin pact of 1939 and Khrushchev's speech denouncing Stalin in 1956 took a lot of wind out of their sails, so by the '70s they had shrunk to insignificance. Then too the FBI under Hoover and its COINTELPRO did a lot to undermine and eventually destroy many of the more radical groups. There's a report I read years back, for instance, that claimed that by the mid 1970s fully one third of the entire SWP membership were FBI informants. The fall of the Soviet Union pretty much was the final straw.
The radical right, as you say, is so much more powerful, and has in fact seized control of the GOP. But then the radical right has always had so much more power than the left, having as it always had backing from the extremely wealthy and much of mainstream religion. Hell, they even for a while had their own country within a country--the Confederate States of America. And now they have control of the Republican Party.
I'm not at all looking forward to the next four years.
bearsfootball516
(6,519 posts)Pretty sure it was run by people who were run away from DU because their ideas were so far to the extreme left, they weren't really accepted here.
Silent Type
(7,342 posts)favorite candidate lost in the primaries.
But I could be wrong, it's been a few years.
Response to milestogo (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
milestogo
(18,275 posts)But I'm really not sure if he just means all democrats or some particular group.
Walleye
(36,439 posts)Charmin One
(200 posts)Anyone who disagrees with him is extreme left. The extremist-in-chief is projecting. Again.
Ping Tung
(1,441 posts)In my opinion it would be better described as Left Leaning Forum for Democrats.
Joinfortmill
(16,635 posts)GreenWave
(9,445 posts)Left has implications of being "sinister" but in baseball you do not have to be as good if you were yet another disposable rightie tightie.
Our Moon, Luna, is what allowed complex life forms to evolve on a rare surface breathable air planet and it stabilizes our rotation.
Underground is where we may encounter space aliens from elsewhere.
Fiendish Thingy
(18,817 posts)Most of DU is pretty mainstream, not radical.
RandiFan1290
(6,455 posts)BannonsLiver
(18,217 posts)hunter
(39,061 posts)My politics are always practical, however.
I don't think "both parties are the same" and I don't think we should "let it all burn" just because Trump won.
I'm not sure what you are rolling on the floor and laughing about.
BannonsLiver
(18,217 posts)Your anecdotal experience aside.
hunter
(39,061 posts)Most of the people on this site are closer to that center than they are to my "anecdotal experiences" as some kind of Social Justice Warrior.
"Anecdotal" has a solid meaning when we are discussing statistics but it can also be used as a subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) slur.
People experience what they experience, and they describe those experiences in ways that make sense to them. You can't dismiss that by calling it anecdotal.
Of course I don't have to accept that some pharmaceutical (for example) is safe and effective just because a random person on the street or a television advertisement tells me so.
I will say you are one of the posters here on DU who frequently irritates me but not enough to put you on "ignore." That's anecdotal, but so what? I believe you and I share a distaste for anti-intellectualism in general, whether it's coming from the "left" or "right." We don't have to agree about the sorts of anti-intellectualism we find most distasteful.
BannonsLiver
(18,217 posts)If it were, we could actually have discussions on issues that are generally unpopular with outside normies and problematic from a political standpoint, rather than having those conversations instantly shut down here if they deviate from the established groupthink.
Iggo
(48,536 posts)There are no radicals here.
(I should probably say, There are very few radicals here.)
Blue Full Moon
(1,326 posts)But the right wingers would think that no matter if it was the same exact position. I couldn't count how many times the magats where I worked called me a moon bat.