General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHistorian Reveals How Hitler 'Dismantled' Democracy in Less Than Two Months
Historian reveals how Hitler 'dismantled' democracy in less than two months - AlternetIn a Wednesday essay for the Atlantic, historian Timothy W. Ryback, who is the director of the Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation in The Hague, described the process in which Hitler rapidly disintegrated Germany's constitutional republic in just 53 days. Ryback noted that after the failed Beer Hall Putsch in which the Nazi leader attempted to violently overthrow the government Hitler abandoned his goal of violent revolution in favor of "destroying the country's democratic system" through legal means.
After his election in 1933, Hitler bragged that the German electorate welcomed him with "jubilation," and rolled out a plan to force out longtime career civil servants with political stooges committed to his vision. He then executed a plan to get two-thirds of the Reichstag (the German parliamentary body) to pass an "empowering law" that would allow him to centralize his authority and govern by decree.
Hitler was convinced that he needed the empowering law to follow through on his campaign promises, which, according to Ryback, included calls to "revive the economy, reduce unemployment, increase military spending, withdraw from international treaty obligations, purge the country of foreigners he claimed were poisoning the blood of the nation and exact revenge on political opponents." He also notably ran on draining den parlamentarischen Sumpf, or "the parliamentarian swamp," and his economic agenda including sweeping new tariffs on grain imports.
SOUNDS FAMILIAR??
Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)If good Germans let Hitler come to power, were they really good Germans?
rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)Initially, after Hitler grasped the reins of power, he had most of the nation working, and inflation dropped.
A loaf of bread didn't cost 10,000 DM. He also played up the the reality that Germany would (could) not pay reparations (particularly to France, especially Clemenceau) really blew it at Versailles.
There were "good Germans." There is a somewhat famous film clip taken by the husband of a woman who was looking at the windows of a Jewish-owned store. When she attempted to enter, a Brown-Shirt "guard" prevented her from entering. She tried to go around him, they had some brief words, and then she left. The entire episode was filmed so that people could see what was on the horizon.
Germans went back to work, essentially building up war stock, the Autobahn, and factories. Without being taxed to death for war reparations, the middle class expanded quickly.
Most of the disabled were seen as "worthless, albeit that took a little time, but they were essentially disposed of. Hidden, then killed, the lame, the insane, and others that didn't "fit the mold" were euthanized. The "enemy" in plain sight was the Jew. Germany lost a huge number of highly skilled and a good portion of the intellectual community when those who could afford it fled. Some, (those on the SS St. Louis are a prime example) were turned away, only to return to Germany and eventually killed.
By that time, fear was the dominant factor. Neighbors turned against each other in a vain attempt to keep the Gestapo at bay. That did not work out so well for most of them.
In September of 1939, Germany invaded Poland. From there on in, if you spoke ill of any action Germany took, you became a target, with the threats directly aimed at your family if you spoke out, and quite a few did, but far more went along with the action. Communists and Jews, Roma, and Slavs, all became targets, and what was left of "Good Germans" went underground.
After the war, those that had survived (not Nazis) began to rebuild the nation, with a lot of help under the Marshal Plan. The West Germans prospered, the East Germans fled until the barriers went up to confine them.
Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)Thanks for the summary.
rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)The punishments can be draconian.
rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)Subservience?
Not while I'm still around. W
We don't have to be violent. We need to stand together and face down the ludicrous notion of being "obedient" to
a regime that should never exist in this nation.
I don't see a Civil War on the horizon, but I see a huge group of people who will refuse to give in to T****'s power grab.
IbogaProject
(3,902 posts)To rebuild their party. And Grandpa Bush funded Hitler. Just a full circle now.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)W. Averell Harriman
IbogaProject
(3,902 posts)Kaleva
(38,718 posts)IbogaProject
(3,902 posts)Kaleva
(38,718 posts)"The son of the railroad magnate Edward Henry Harriman, he began his employment with the Union Pacific Railroad Company in 1915; he served as chairman of the board in 193246. During this period he was affiliated with the investment bank Brown Brothers Harriman and helped establish the Union Banking Corporation (UBC), both of which were enmeshed with the financial interests of German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, who helped fund the rise of the Nazi Party. Despite the release of documents in the early 21st century that confirmed that UBCs holdings were vested by the U.S. government in 1942, the nature of Harrimans involvement with prewar and early wartime German business enterprises remained the subject of conjecture."
https://www.britannica.com/biography/W-Averell-Harriman
Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.
That word is "Nazi." Nobody cares about their motives anymore."
ZonkerHarris
(25,521 posts)Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)All Germans were considered our enemies.
sheshe2
(88,577 posts)lapfog_1
(30,285 posts)especially the German Armed forces until June 30, 1934.
This was the night of long knives when he killed Ernst Rohm and the entire leadership of the "Brown Shirts" ( the true believers in the Nazi / MAGA goals ).
That was the deal he made with the German Army leadership to ensure their loyalty and cooperation ( they no longer worried that he would replace the leadership of the Army with the Brown Shirts - who were looked at as kooks and idiots ). Something that the militias that are Trumps "kooks and idiots" should be aware of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives
TommyT139
(791 posts)rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)(I am not a Historian) the parallels are pretty damn close.
First, take over the media, back then it was radio and print.
Create an enemy within.
Repeat the lie until it becomes "truth".
Intimidate those who are not on board.
Have the elected officials capitulate.
Take grasp of the Executive and become the "one who knows how to fix everything".
It's a simple plan, and simple minds will follow it. No need to think, 'The Leader" will do that for you.
I am ashamed that this is coming about in our country. As with former assholes, this will come crashing down.
It is far better that it never gets into anything that appears to be mainstream. Delusional people fall for this shit.
DU'ers are not delusional. We will take this on to preserve our Republic.
I'll be with you on the streets.
Dissent is Patriotic!
KS Toronado
(19,952 posts)We as a party should flood Washington DC with our "14th AMENDMENT" signs, circle the Capitol
building, the SCOTUS, and the White House. Let's get our elected officials attention that no one is
supposed to be above the law and we don't want to see this great Country destroyed.
MadameButterfly
(2,134 posts)It's not just what dictators do. He's clearly studied Hitler's playbook. There can't be that many coincicences. Hitler actually said "Drain the swamp."
allegorical oracle
(3,591 posts)twice with gambling casinos, where the house always wins. And we know he doesn't read. Someone has to coif his hair in the mornings.
He's had help figuring out this fascist gambit -- Bannon, Musk and others, perhaps the Heritage crowd, have slipped a collar and leash on him and are leading him where he's going.
MadameButterfly
(2,134 posts)who has definitely studied Hitler and associates.
I'm not suggesting that he has immersed himself in whole books or has an understanding of anything deeply. He picks what he wants about Hitler, missing the part about Hitler's generals trying to assassinate him.
Mostly he is concerned with shower heads, acquiring property, and revenge.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)It was Hindenburg who defeated Hitler in a landslide in the 1932 presidential election
It was Hindenburg who appointed Hitler to be Chancellor.
It was Hindenburg who issued the Reichstag Fire Decree.
It was Hindenburg who signed into law the Enabling Act.
We don't have anything close to that
rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)And there you have it.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)President Hindenburg died at the age of 87 on 2 August 1934. Shortly after Hindenburg's death, Hitler announced that offices of the chancellor and the president were to be combined to create one position, the Führer and chancellor. Hitler announced that he would occupy this new role.
Hitler knew Hindenburg would die soon, thereby opening the door for an authoritarian regime.
If Congress shows its usual lack of a spine and a SCOTUS that gives almost "unlimited" power to a sitting president, there is little that
would keep T**** from walking through the door and doing all kinds of mayhem.
Theoretically, while different forms of government, there are numerous possibilities that can come from the situation we are facing.
Some GOP members of Congresscritters are showing a couple of vertebrae, the question is, will they stick to principles, or abscond their
duty?
These clowns can't get past a Budget Resolution.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)Hindenburg was popular with the German masses as shown by his landslide victory over Hitler in 1932 and possibly more importantly, Hindenburg had the full backing of the German Army.
Hindenburg could have crushed Hitler and the Nazi Party .
rasputin1952
(83,358 posts)But we'll never really know Hindenburg's motives.
Considering his age, relative dislike for Hitler, and Hitler's ability to appear humble at times (particularly when facing power in his earlier life), he may have (and Hindenburg's advisors) seen it as a way to placate the people. Not understanding what Hitler could do in the near future, could have played a part as well.
History is riddled with "exceptions to the norm)" that are difficult to explain. Hindenburg was exceptionally popular, and a decent leader, he may well have been trying to placate the radicals to some degree (shrug).
The odd part to me is that he had to know he was not going to live long, did he, or those around him, foresee that Hitler would combine the two offices and become a dictator?
We have a president-elect who actually stated he wanted to be a dictator. I would never, in my life, believe anyone who made such a statement would be a viable candidate for the highest office in the land. Yet (however we got here) danger is in the doorway.
I don't think that T**** is going to make it through this term, but I've been proven wrong, so I'm not going to count on that. As of the results of the election, I'm focusing on 2026, getting involved with changing the change to Congress to thwart whatever this moron plans for the nation.
There is no Teddy Roosevelt in the wings, it is imperative that we do not sacrifice our democracy to the whims of MAGAts.
History echoes, it does not repeat itself, but it seems as though it can. Two different governments at two distinctly different times are not capable of repeating things of the past. They can get petty close though, and therein lies a serious dilemma.
A compliant SCOTUS is the true danger.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(19,256 posts)Seems appropriate.
calimary
(84,811 posts)diane in sf
(4,109 posts)a pretty good helping of weird. Makes the little mustache seem almost normal.
calimary
(84,811 posts)whod accompany him everywhere for every occasion or event.
SHEESH - talk about tan lines? You can see where the pancake makeup ends and his bare ghostly white skin begins. Its not supposed to work that way - or LOOK that way!
Irish_Dem
(60,803 posts)Grokenstein
(5,869 posts)If we can learn from the past, maybe we can skip through to the good part.
Whiskeytide
(4,518 posts)exploit Hitlers numerous mistakes and turn back his fascist agenda with military might. These assholes are likely to try and avoid Germanys mistakes in the run up to the war, and I dont really see anyone who can go up against an axis of the US, China and Russia (militarily or economically). Most countries will likely capitulate without firing a shot.
dalton99a
(85,178 posts)dalton99a
(85,178 posts)How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 Days
He used the constitution to shatter the constitution.
By Timothy W. Ryback
January 8, 2025, 8:30 AM ET
Ninety-two years ago this month, on Monday morning, January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed the 15th chancellor of the Weimar Republic. In one of the most astonishing political transformations in the history of democracy, Hitler set about destroying a constitutional republic through constitutional means. What follows is a step-by-step account of how Hitler systematically disabled and then dismantled his countrys democratic structures and processes in less than two months time specifically, one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours, and 40 minutes. The minutes, as we will see, mattered.
Hans Frank served as Hitlers private attorney and chief legal strategist in the early years of the Nazi movement. While later awaiting execution at Nuremberg for his complicity in Nazi atrocities, Frank commented on his clients uncanny capacity for sensing the potential weakness inherent in every formal form of law and then ruthlessly exploiting that weakness. Following his failed Beer Hall Putsch of November 1923, Hitler had renounced trying to overthrow the Weimar Republic by violent means but not his commitment to destroying the countrys democratic system, a determination he reiterated in a Legalitätseid legality oath before the Constitutional Court in September 1930. Invoking Article 1 of the Weimar constitution, which stated that the government was an expression of the will of the people, Hitler informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to mold the government as he saw fit. It was an astonishingly brazen statement.
So, through constitutional means? the presiding judge asked.
Jawohl! Hitler replied.
By January 1933, the fallibilities of the Weimar Republic whose 181-article constitution framed the structures and processes for its 18 federated states were as obvious as they were abundant. Having spent a decade in opposition politics, Hitler knew firsthand how easily an ambitious political agenda could be scuttled. He had been co-opting or crushing right-wing competitors and paralyzing legislative processes for years, and for the previous eight months, he had played obstructionist politics, helping to bring down three chancellors and twice forcing the president to dissolve the Reichstag and call for new elections.
...
CrispyQ
(38,720 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel%27s_Loophole
snip...
Gödel's Loophole is a supposed "inner contradiction" in the Constitution of the United States which Austrian-American logician, mathematician, and analytic philosopher Kurt Gödel postulated in 1947. The loophole would permit the American democracy to be legally turned into a dictatorship. Gödel told his friend Oskar Morgenstern about the existence of the flaw and Morgenstern told Albert Einstein about it at the time, but Morgenstern, in his recollection of the incident in 1971, never mentioned the exact problem as Gödel saw it. This has led to speculation about the precise nature of what has come to be called "Gödel's Loophole." It has been called "one of the great unsolved problems of constitutional law" by F. E. Guerra-Pujol.[1]
More at link.
Diraven
(1,110 posts)Not even waiting until he's in office before completely abandoning the policies he was elected on and instead saying we need to go to war to conquer basically all of North America.
KS Toronado
(19,952 posts)we know what comes next.
LudwigPastorius
(11,259 posts)Not exactly a 'day one dictator' like Trump aspires to be.
Historic NY
(38,189 posts)his mega bill he want will complete it.
Lovie777
(15,465 posts)millions dead and suffered.
shithole's utopia.
Kid Berwyn
(18,604 posts)Corrupt Congress? Check.
Corrupt Executive? As of EOB January 20, Check.
Now, lets stop them.
The Constitution, Freedom and History are counting on us.
And we owe it to them all who came before us to do the same.
Johnny2X2X
(21,968 posts)Godwin's law does not apply here. Why? because Trump, and several people around him all along, are literal admirers of Nazism. Not the type that say, "Oh, well, he did do some good things." But the type that say, "I have studied their methods in detail and our entire movement follows the Nazi pplan to seize power."
Trumpism is very puprosely modeled after Nazism. You've got Trump speech writers admitting they studied Joseph Goebbels and use his teachings about propaganda while writing Trump's speeches. Nearly every aspect of Trumpism is purpoisely borrowed from Nazism.
Now I am not sure that genocide is their ultimate goal, but absolute Hitler like power surely is.
Kaleva
(38,718 posts)He was appointed Chancellor by then President Hindenburg.
In the 1932 presidential election, Hindenburg had crushed Hitler.
It was Hindenburg who issued the Reichstag Fire Decree and signed into law the Enabling Act.
It's often overlooked the key role Hindenburg played in Hitler's take over of the German government.
Kid Berwyn
(18,604 posts)And, like the Turd Reich, Mein Kampf lives again in Project 2025.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219606739
kentuck
(113,027 posts)Don't say, "It couldn't happen here."
Clouds Passing
(3,124 posts)elocs
(23,105 posts)Wounded Bear
(60,972 posts)The Weimar Republic was Germany's first stab at democracy and it was fragile, as all democracies are - especially in the early years.
It takes longer here, but it can be and is being done.
B.See
(4,023 posts)number of (sometimes unlikely) politicians and people are going belly up and kissing the ring, maybe not as long as one would think.