General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy We Shouldn't Ignore Pete Hegseth's Retweet on Women's Voting Rights
Its about more than our right to vote, though. By saying we dont deserve autonomy over our own participation in democracy, Wilson is effectively relegating women to second-class citizen status. And once we go there, its a slippery slope.
The idea that women should surrender their vote to male authority is an affront to every American who has fought, marched, and bled for the right to be heard, adds Stewart. When men make diminishing statements about women, it harms our autonomy and our safety.
https://www.glamour.com/story/why-we-shouldnt-ignore-pete-hegseths-retweet-on-womens-voting-rights
Fiendish Thingy
(22,181 posts)It gets lots of attention, but changes absolutely nothing about reality - women can still vote, regardless of what he says.
hamsterjill
(17,101 posts)The plan is set out in Project 2025 and taking the vote away from women is most definitely one of the goals.
People told me Roe would never be overturned. I don't believe anything any more.
Quiet Em
(2,565 posts)There are Republican legislatures in States who are actively looking for ways to deter and put up barriers that prevent women from voting.
You may not take this obscene viewpoint and issue seriously, but I do.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,181 posts)Womens right to vote still stands regardless of anyones viewpoint, just as it did in 1920, when millions of men (and women) were against women voting, but the amendment was ratified anyway.
Americanme
(385 posts)The Hegseth moron is one of the people influencing trump. And absolutely nothing is too radical for trump to consider, especially when he wants to distract from his past sins. A conservative congress will fall in line.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,181 posts)Neither Hegseth, Trump or SCOTUS has the power to repeal a constitutional amendment.
(The Dobbs ruling didnt involve erasing black letter law contained within a constitutional amendment- It was an egregious rejection of stare decisis , which is outrageous itself, but didnt involve the removal of text from the constitution)
Everybody seems to forget that, and they imbue a tweet from a former FOX moron with all sorts of magical powers.
Dont buy into the myth that Trump is omnipotent and the states and the people are powerless.
There are too many real life, here and now problems to be dealt with to be distracted by idiotic trolling.
Quiet Em
(2,565 posts)how women can and will be disadvantaged at at State level. There are States working on their own versions of the SAVE act as we speak.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,181 posts)The SAVE act copycats should definitely be challenged.
I was responding to the assumption by some that all womens right to vote would be stripped away simply by Hegseth willing it to be so.
T_i_B
(14,882 posts)Given Doug Wilson's target audience is pretty much exclusively MAGA types it will have definitely served that purpose.
Solly Mack
(96,433 posts)And that's precisely why we can't ignore their attacks on women and promoting the idea that we should lose our right to vote is an attack.
valleyrogue
(2,604 posts)is via another constitutional amendment. The numbers in Congress and in the state legislatures repeal the 19th amendment are not there and never will be. The only way woman suffrage could ever, ever, ever be repealed is if there was another constitutional convention and they would have to start all over from scratch. It isnt going to happen. The only reason these men are wanting to do away with the 19th amendment is simply as a means for voter suppression because women are far more likely to vote Democratic than men. The gender gap has been known for decades. Many men can be very politically stupid and vote against their own best interests. Women are far more likely to know what is that stake because they are less privileged than men are as a group. Rather than acknowledge these men vote the wrong way and should perhaps do some reflection and realize Republicans do not have their interest at heart, these men double down, especially the religious types of the so-called Christian reconstructionists.
Quiet Em
(2,565 posts)There are States that are currently looking into implementing their own versions of the SAVE act.
https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlg/2020/01/the-19th-amendment-at-100-modern-challenges/