What Trump might be up to on the Epstein files:

[applegrove]

www.rawstory.com/jeffrey-epst...

— Marilyn 🇨🇦 (@mlauriat.bsky.social) 2025-11-18T01:41:15.773Z

[Maraya1969]

1. It seems to me that you think Epstein files are filled with all this shit on you and the first

dump is not that important. Trust me, dingbat that everything they need is right in the papers.

[applegrove]

3. Are you calling me a dingbat? I have not been myself for the past months I'll admit.

[Maraya1969]

5. NO! I was referring to the people in the post. Sorry you misunderstood.

[Justice matters.]

2. It's not a "secret" plan.

He posted a specific "order" to bondi (who previously closed the case saying there was nobody else to indict) to investigate Clinton and Co on Lie Social.

Publicly! Secrets are supposed to be secret...

[2naSalit]

4. He could be on...

Another fool's errand on this.

Since they are specifically going after Democrats, the files pertaining to those can be held but what if someone argues that they aren't investigating their folks so the files could be subjected to hairsplitting as to which files they can actually withhold.

[Justice matters.]

6. Pedo the felon lied saying they are all Democrats

So since that lie implies the files are only about his (Epstein's) "Democrat" friends, bondi will say all the files are under investigation (since only Dems are in them is the Lie).

SHe will lie saying she can't release the files because the Dem friends of Epstein are under investigation.

[BeerBarrelPolka]

7. And Trump was a Democrat back then

[2naSalit]

9. Lest we forget.

[2naSalit]

8. Pretty much.

Exact wording carries weight in legal argument and most of them are smart enough to figure that one out on their own, and they lack vocabulary, bigly.