Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,413 posts)
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:08 PM 1 hr ago

Do we no longer need an East Wing for the First Ladies?

I expect there will be First Ladies in the future, who deserve to have their own East Wing to work from.

It's sad that Melania has no place to go in Washington. Trump tore it down to spite her, is my opinion. Now, there is a big hole in the ground and Trump is ignoring judicial orders to halt construction of his "ball room". A friggin' ballroom!

I keep waiting for Republicans to come to their senses. But I suppose that is very difficult to do when you have no senses?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do we no longer need an East Wing for the First Ladies? (Original Post) kentuck 1 hr ago OP
Honestly, I don't think the First Partner... mr715 1 hr ago #1
Do you think a ballroom would be more useful? kentuck 1 hr ago #4
Oh absolutely not. mr715 1 hr ago #5
In my opinion... kentuck 1 hr ago #6
It'll be an interesting test mr715 1 hr ago #7
Do you think Melania is actually sad about it? newdeal2 1 hr ago #2
Nah. Melania lives in New York. Raven123 1 hr ago #3
It has nothing to do with Melania JI7 1 hr ago #8

mr715

(3,576 posts)
1. Honestly, I don't think the First Partner...
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:10 PM
1 hr ago

really needs extensive office space. They've been getting increasingly more active and their footprint has increased, but the elevation of First Partners is very monarchic and I think we should step away from it.

Do people talk about the husband of the EU president or the wife of PM Starmer?

mr715

(3,576 posts)
5. Oh absolutely not.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:17 PM
1 hr ago

The ballroom is ridiculous and stupid.

Yeah, we might disagree. Still appreciate ya.

kentuck

(115,413 posts)
6. In my opinion...
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:18 PM
1 hr ago

..If we don't permit it to be built, then we won't have to tear it down.

mr715

(3,576 posts)
7. It'll be an interesting test
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:24 PM
1 hr ago

If it doesn't get built, that'll be a devastating psychic blow to Trump. He wants it so, so bad.

If it does get built, it really should be burned down. Controlled burn. Deliberate. It'd be like a ritual cleansing for the nation.

My opinion is we should restore the East wing, but in my ideal world, it'd be devoted to government work and the Offices of the First Lord/Lady be reduced significantly.

newdeal2

(5,440 posts)
2. Do you think Melania is actually sad about it?
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:12 PM
1 hr ago

She doesn't want to be anywhere near that pig. She's still clinging on to her adult son as a reason to stay behind in NYC. She's happier with this arrangement.

Raven123

(7,818 posts)
3. Nah. Melania lives in New York.
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:13 PM
1 hr ago

He tore it down to spite America. He thinks if he builds a ballroom, he will be immortalized, like Washington, Lincoln, FDR, etc. We will spend time, energy and money undoing the damage, but I believe we will undo it.

JI7

(93,627 posts)
8. It has nothing to do with Melania
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:30 PM
1 hr ago

She doesn't want to stay at the white house and doesn't care what happens to that space.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do we no longer need an E...