A grammatical observation and question

[choie]

I've noticed - especially since GW Bush - people no longer call things by their full name. For example calling nuclear power or arms just "nuclear" as in "Iran won't accept an agreement that includes nuclear." Other examples: calling a domestic violence incident "a domestic". or saying "I have bipolar" instead of bipolar disorder. What gives?

And before anybody says it, I know I'm being a stickler and intolerant.

[SheltieLover]

1. Twitter brain...

[choie]

3. Hmm I remember Bush always said just "nuclear"

Well, he actually said "nucular" But I get what your saying!

[SheltieLover]

5. 120 char communications destroy neural networks

Wait till AI finishes the job. 😓

[Brother Buzz]

6. Curiously, Jimmy Carter, a U.S. Navy nuclear engineer pronounced it the same way

[The Blue Flower]

2. Another one

Using 'cyber' as a noun.

[choie]

4. YES!!!

[wnylib]

15. And "Oval" instead of "Oval Office."

[LearnedHand]

20. Cyber works really well as a noun

When you have departments named “Cybersecurity” its really easy to shorten it to cyber and use it as a noun. It’s also useful and efficient.

[Disaffected]

22. As in "Baron knows the cyber"

by guess who?

[canetoad]

7. People no longer

Give presents, they GIFT items. And there's no more criticising - it's up-market CRITIQUES these days.

[choie]

8. Lord, that's right!

[Easterncedar]

14. Oh yeah. Drives me mad. No one donates. Gave and given are vanishing

Is it that irregular verbs confuse people?

I have come to accept that people can't keep affect and effect straight, so no one is affected, we are impacted instead, which always sounds quite uncomfortable to me.

We have forever lost the distinction between jealous and envious, and, heaven help us, the difference between disinterested and uninterested, which seems like a sad loss of a valuable concept. As they say, you better hope you get a disinterested judge in your trial, not an uninterested one.

[róisín_dubh]

25. Gifting or gifting grinds my gears nt

[canetoad]

27. Mine too

It's like a form of self-congratulation for being generous.

[FadedMullet]

9. Like you said, it's grammar. I've had some experiance in the South and noticed a long time ago that folks shortened.....

.......phrases by saying things like "The lawn needs mowed" instead of "The lawn needs to be mowed".

[Easterncedar]

13. Yep, that's one!

And ugh "adulting" rather than acting like an adult.

[róisín_dubh]

26. Very common in Appalachia

I couldn’t stand it when I lived there

[wyn borkins]

10. Agree With You :: I Do (!)

Also, you "might" be a stickler (?)

But you are definitely not intolerant (!)

[choie]

11. Thanks wyn!

[Easterncedar]

12. Yes, it seems to be an accelerating trend

Like "give me the deets" (details). "No prob." Sometimes I get annoyed, but then I recall how long we have called temporary workers temps (even coining the verb temping), automobiles autos then cars, telephones phones, televisions teevees, doctors docs and so on. Is it laziness or efficiency?

Maybe we should have a thread asking for folks' least favorite examples of linguistic shorthand

[radical noodle]

16. You want to go with?

With what, who, when? This bothers me more than any other.

[LoisB]

18. I noticed that while watching the Darral Brooks trial. I thought it was a Wisconsin

"thing".

[3catwoman3]

31. It's also an Illinois thing.

I grew up in the western end of New York State and never heard this until moving to Illinois in 1994. “Go with” and “come with.”

Drives me batty.

[WhiskeyGrinder]

35. This isn't new. It's a function of how English is spoken by people in areas where there were a lot of settlers who spoke

German or some Scandinavian languages.

[LoisB]

17. I agree. You are not being intolerant. It seems as if everything is shorthand

these days.

[LearnedHand]

19. Language is very fluid and fast moving

I love how frequently language pokes us in the eye by not being rigid. Maybe a different way to look at this is to celebrate the creativity of ever changing language.

[B.See]

30. This! Sometimes I love playing with language and

sentence structure, whether that's unusual punctuation, a turn of expression, tossing in a coloquialism, regionalism, street lingo, expletives (when p.oed), alliteration or alternate spellings.

Just to ping the noggin, mix things up a bit, or for a dash of whimsy -

but mostly because I can.

[GenThePerservering]

21. Oh dear - language changes. How painful. nt

[Disaffected]

23. And ya, like I mean, your know,

its gonna keep happenin'.

[Disaffected]

24. One reason I enjoy listening to BBC World Service and Al Jazeera

is that they still speak English there.

[calimary]

28. I've noticed that, too.

We listen to BBC World Service in the car quite frequently. Just seems like the smart thing to do, these days.

[EverHopeful]

29. I've actually come to enjoy many of the shortenings mentioned here

Not sure why.

One usage that still irks me though, is what feels like an overuse of "concerning." Often things that should be described as horrifying, or at least worrying or troubling, are called "concerning." Always makes me think of Susan Collins.

[3catwoman3]

32. I detest impactful. Clunky and awkward.

In my career field, health care be/nursing, to be impacted means to be severely constipated. In other words, truly FOS - full of shit.

What’s wrong with influential? It sounds much more sophisticated and elegant.

[sdfernando]

33. Leaving important words out leads

to confusion and misunderstanding. The poster/writer is making tbe reader assume something.....you know what happens we we asume.

[Mister Ed]

34. The worst, to me, is calling a conspiracy theory a conspiracy. That's become all too common. n/t