Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(52,843 posts)
Tue Dec 17, 2024, 10:51 AM Dec 17

UK proposes letting tech firms use copyrighted work to train AI

Source: Guardian

Campaigners for the protection of the rights of creatives have criticised a UK government proposal to let artificial intelligence companies train their algorithms on their works under a new copyright exemption.

Book publishers said the proposal put out for consultation on Tuesday was “entirely untested and unevidenced” while Beeban Kidron, a crossbench peer campaigning to protect artists’ and creatives’ rights, said she was “very disappointed”.

Under the proposals, tech companies will be allowed to freely use copyrighted material to train artificial intelligence models unless creative professionals and companies opt out of the process.

-snip-

On Tuesday, News media organisations said that such a system would allow generative AI firms to “shirk their responsibilities”. Kidron said: “The government is consulting on giving away the creativity and livelihoods of the UK creative sector which is worth £126bn a year”.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/17/uk-proposes-letting-tech-firms-use-copyrighted-work-to-train-ai



This would be incredibly harmful. Damn them.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UK proposes letting tech firms use copyrighted work to train AI (Original Post) highplainsdem Dec 17 OP
Why is the onus always put on the individual to opt out. I know the answer but it's infuriating. CrispyQ Dec 17 #1
That's theft. Sanity Claws Dec 17 #2

CrispyQ

(38,598 posts)
1. Why is the onus always put on the individual to opt out. I know the answer but it's infuriating.
Tue Dec 17, 2024, 11:03 AM
Dec 17

Apparently it's asking too much for the multi-million dollar company to get authorization first before using someone's intellectual property.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UK proposes letting tech ...