Ohio lawmakers approve charging up to $750 for police and jail videos

[Auggie]

Source: Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — People seeking copies of police and jail videos in Ohio may have to pay up to $750, or $75 for each hour of video released, if Gov. Mike DeWine signs a measure approved by the state Legislature this week.

The fee was included in an amendment to the state’s sunshine laws that was quietly introduced and passed early Thursday by the GOP-controlled Legislature. It now heads to the desk of the Republican governor. It’s not clear when or if he’ll act on it. A news media group is urging a veto.

First Amendment and government transparency advocates said they were blindsided by the measure, which would give state and local law enforcement agencies the option to charge people for making copies of records that most departments now provide for free or little cost.

Each state and local department or agency could set their own fee, up to $75 an hour, for videos produced by body cameras, dashboard cameras and surveillance cameras inside jails. They also could continue to provide these public records free of charge. The fees would be capped at $750 per request for each department involved.

-----------------

From the link:

• Ohio’s American Civil Liberties Union chapter called the bill a major blow for government transparency and accountability.

• An executive director of the Ohio News Media Association, and the ACLU, both said they had no indication lawmakers were even considering such a measure until after it had already passed.

• State Attorney General Dave Yost said the bill is a “solid way” to approach what he called an “expensive, labor-intensive process,” citing that social media influencers and professional YouTube creators have bogged down police departments with requests for such videos, effectively “making the taxpayers subsidize their little garden businesses.”



Read more: https://www.news-herald.com/2024/12/21/ohio-lawmakers-approve-charging-up-to-750-for-police-and-jail-videos/

[underpants]

1. And Louisiana forbidding promoting vaccines and flu shots.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10542823

[getagrip_already]

2. He is right about youtube channels using the videos.....

They routinely use dashcam, bodycam, and jail cam videos as part of their weekly feeds.

It nets them hundreds of thousands a year in profit . All they have to invest is editing.

And they humiliate arrestees in the process. We treat prisoners under the geneva convention better than that.

We need privacy legislation that prohibits publishing this footage for profit. Fair use is fine, no more than 30 seconds in total. That is enough for legitimate news purposes. But 30 minutes of the worst night in someones life for a quick buck is just being a papparazi.

[AZJonnie]

3. I could see the logic of charging the general public a nominal administrative fee for the videos

But absolutely not for involved defendants and/or litigants to civil suits, that would be entirely unacceptable. Whether 'The Press' should be subject to a fee is debatable. Most serious organizations aren't going to bat an eye over a $75 fee (important videos are usually pretty short), it's not enough money that it's going to hamper the public's ability to be informed which would be my main concern there, and as an amount for the service, $75/hour of video is not unreasonable. I mean, pretty much anytime you want something from the government, you pay an administrative fee, and most people think nothing of it. But there could be something important I'm missing in the equation.