The E.P.A. Promotes Toxic Fertilizer. 3M Told It of Risks Years Ago.
Source: New York Times
The E.P.A. Promotes Toxic Fertilizer. 3M Told It of Risks Years Ago.
The agency obtained research from 3M in 2003 revealing that sewage sludge, the raw material for the fertilizer, carried toxic "forever chemicals."
By Hiroko Tabuchi
Hiroko Tabuchi reviewed thousands of pages of decades-old documents to report this article.
Dec. 27, 2024 Updated 8:26 a.m. ET
In early 2000, scientists at 3M, the chemicals giant, made a startling discovery: High levels of PFAS, the virtually indestructible "forever chemicals" used in nonstick pans, stain-resistant carpets and many other products were turning up in the nation's sewage. ... The researchers were concerned. The data suggested that the toxic chemicals, made by 3M, were fast becoming ubiquitous in the environment. The company's research had already linked exposure to birth defects, cancer and more.
That sewage was being used as fertilizer on farmland nationwide, a practice encouraged by the Environmental Protection Agency. The presence of PFAS in the sewage meant those chemicals were being unwittingly spread on fields across the country. ... 3M didn't publish the research, but the company did share its findings with the E.P.A. at a 2003 meeting, according to 3M documents reviewed by the The New York Times. The research and the E.P.A.'s knowledge of it has not been previously reported.
Today, the E.P.A. continues to promote sewage sludge as fertilizer and doesn't require testing for PFAS, despite the fact that whistle-blowers, academics, state officials and the agency's internal studies over the years have also raised contamination concerns.
{snip}
David Lewis, a former E.P.A. microbiologist, issued early warnings. Will Crooks for The New York Times
In a statement, 3M said that the sewage study had been shared with the E.P.A., and was therefore available to anyone who searched for it in the agency's archives. The agency had sought 3M's research into the chemicals as part of an investigation in the early 2000s into their health effects.
{snip}
Hiroko Tabuchi covers pollution and the environment for The Times. She has been a journalist for more than 20 years in Tokyo and New York. More about Hiroko Tabuchi
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/27/climate/epa-pfas-fertilizer-3m-forever-chemicals.html
Is this what they're talking about? From 2022:
Government & Politics
Toxic: 3M knew its chemicals were harmful decades ago, but didn't tell the public, government
https://minnesotareformer.com/2022/12/15/toxic-3m-knew-its-chemicals-were-harmful-decades-ago-but-didnt-tell-the-public-government/
Internal documents show the Minnesota company hid the dangers for decades
By: Deena Winter - December 15, 2022 6:01 am
This is part 2 of 2. Read part 1, about East Metro residents who wonder if 3M chemicals made them sick.
3M toxicologist Richard Purdy did a study in 1998 to see whether any of the company's perfluorochemicals showed up in the blood of eagles and albatrosses. ... That seemed unlikely, given the birds' diet consists mostly of fish. So Purdy was surprised and disturbed when he found levels in their blood similar to those found in human blood. It even showed up in bald eagle nestlings whose only food was fish their parents fed them from remote lakes.
That indicated what Purdy later called "widespread environmental contamination" -- the likelihood the manmade, toxic chemicals were moving through the food chain and accumulating in animals. ... Purdy warned 3M that if wild birds' blood contained the chemicals, then fish-eating mammals -- like otters, mink, porpoise and seals -- could have it, too. A study of rats found they had significant levels of a 3M chemical in their livers, likely from eating fishmeal.
He told company officials in an email there was a significant risk of ecological harm, which should be reported to the EPA. ... In response, 3M managers dispersed the team collecting the data, Purdy alleged. ... Purdy resigned in 1999 and sent his resignation letter to the EPA, informing them that while 3M had disclosed to the EPA that a chemical called PFOS "had been found in the blood of animals," it didn't mention that it was found in the blood of eaglets.
{snip}
cbabe
(4,315 posts)A riveting exposé, Fateful Harvest tells the story of Patty Martin -- the mayor of a small Washington town called Quincy -- who discovers American industries are dumping toxic waste into farmers' fields and home gardens by labeling it "fertilizer." She becomes outraged at the failed crops, sick horses, and rare diseases in her town, as well as the threats to her children's health. Yet, when she blows the whistle on a nationwide problem, Patty Martin is nearly run out of town. Duff Wilson, whose Seattle Times series on this story was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, provides the definitive account of a new and alarming environmental scandal. Fateful Harvest is a gripping study of corruption and courage, of recklessness and reckoning. It is a story that speaks to the greatest fears -- and ultimate hope -- in us all.
MichMan
(13,565 posts)So she turned to the Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government agency that regulates drinking water. Walters was confident the agency would come in, find answers and fix things quickly. Instead, when EPA Region 5 Director Susan Hedman found out about the astronomically high levels of lead in Flint water, emails show she tried to keep it under wraps.
Hedman resigned in January amid the crisis. It has become clear the EPA did not live up to its mission in Flint.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/14/health/flint-water-epa-investigation/index.html
IbogaProject
(3,799 posts)I saw a How It's Made that went through all the processing of NYC sewage and at the end it got shipped to Florida not just as fertilizer but as "Organic" fertilizer.
Tumbulu
(6,458 posts)keeping it all out of organic agriculture.
Nothing that has the NOP organic seal on it is allowed to have used any sewage sludge as fertilizer.
All records were broken by people writing to the USDA to be sure that no sewage sludge would be allowed to be used in organic agriculture. This article articulatesis exactly why we fought so hard to keep it out.
That some no name entity is claiming sewage sludge is "organic" needs to be reported. There are criminal fines that can be levied against them. That is what we fought for for decades. Organically grown products are actually defined and this means quite a bit, despite what all the naysayers have to say about it.
IbogaProject
(3,799 posts)Which isn't certified Organic. I just wasn't sure if USDA Organic had looser standards.
Tumbulu
(6,458 posts)codified by law.
The use of any products containing anything from off the farm must be approved by the certifier.
No sewage sludge in any product is allowed and has never been allowed. The USDA tried to make us use it and there was a literal all time record breaking letter writing campaign in the early 90s that is talked about to this day.
KT2000
(20,954 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 27, 2024, 07:51 PM - Edit history (1)
has been segregated from mainstream publications to cover for all kinds of information that showed profitable products could cause cancer, brain damage, miscarriages, and more. Corporations only care about money, not consequences of their actions. Quarterly results over the integrity of the US population. Remember too - all those health conditions make money for corporations too. Look to countries with socialized medicine for more honest research.
Martin68
(24,738 posts)To many of us it was obvious that spreading sewage on farmland was a bad idea from the beginning, but now we know a lot more about the harmful contents of sewage even after it is "treated."