US Supreme Court turns away appeal of Texas library book ban
Source: Reuters
December 8, 2025 1:09 PM EST Updated 1 hour ago
WASHINGTON, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court in a free speech case on Monday opted not to hear an appeal by a group of residents of a rural Texas county of a judicial decision allowing local officials to remove 17 books that these officials deemed objectionable from public libraries.
The justices let stand a lower court's decision allowing the removal of books including ones dealing with themes of race and LGBT identity, from its public library system. The lower court rejected the argument made by the plaintiffs that removing the books was unlawful under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protections against government abridgment of free speech.
The decision by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applies to the states of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi but does not set a nationwide legal precedent. There has been a surge in book banning in public schools and public libraries in recent years in many locations around the United States, driven by conservative groups and new state laws limiting what kinds of books children can access.
Llano County is a rural area about 80 miles (130 km) from the Texas state capital Austin. The dispute began in 2021 when one faction of local residents asked the Llano County library commissioner to remove the disputed books, which covered topics including transgender issues, race and slavery in the United States, puberty and bodily functions like flatulence.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us-supreme-court-turns-away-appeal-texas-library-book-ban-2025-12-08/
2na fisherman
(201 posts)They can ban those books but not those ideas...yet!
SunSeeker
(57,394 posts)bluestarone
(20,987 posts)When the BASTARDS want to. I wish really bad health to the TRUMPY SIX!!
FBaggins
(28,612 posts)It's just one of scores of cases that failed to make the cut.
As for "When the BASTARDS want to"... if they had wanted to they could have taken the case and upheld it... which would set a national precedent. This limitss it to the 5th circuit.
cstanleytech
(28,119 posts)reACTIONary
(6,913 posts)Initech
(107,108 posts)And doing so to "protect children" does more harm to kids than good. Fuck Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones and Moms For Liberty to the hottest circle of hell!
Polybius
(21,316 posts)Not sure I am absolute on this. A few years ago, Amazon and eBay banned David Duke's books. Also, I have some mixed feelings on The Anarchist's Cookbook.
Initech
(107,108 posts)But I'm definitely not touching the censorship / free speech issue with a 100,000 foot pole.
cstanleytech
(28,119 posts)cstanleytech
(28,119 posts)DBoon
(24,616 posts)How does passing gas offend right wing christian nationalism ?
Is there something unpatriotic about gastrointestinal functions?
Do white christians not pass gas? Is this something only unpatriotic heathens and pagans do?