Clarence Thomas Sits Out Supreme Court Student Loan Case Decision
Source: Newsweek
Published Dec 08, 2025 at 11:00 AM EST updated Dec 08, 2025 at 12:52 PM EST
Justice Clarence Thomas did not participate in the Supreme Court's decision on a petition for rehearing concerning a student loan case, according to an order list released on Monday.
Why It Matters
The case, William F. Kaetz v. United States et al., marked a notable recusal in the ongoing national conversation over student debt and its legal implications.
Thomas is one of the longest-serving members of the Supreme Court. His recusal from student loan-related cases comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Court's handling of loan forgiveness initiatives, an issue that has significant financial and political implications for millions of Americans. Thomass past public comments about facing personal student loan debt have complicated his role as the Court examines the legality of loan relief.
What To Know
The Supreme Court's brief order did not provide a specific reason for Thomass recusal. Federal judicial ethics rules guide justices to abstain from cases where there may be a conflict of interest, personal involvement, or the appearance thereof.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-sits-out-supreme-court-student-loan-case-decision-11174508
OAITW r.2.0
(31,203 posts)Blumancru
(150 posts)Something is fishy about this.
BigDemVoter
(4,672 posts)Irish_Dem
(78,765 posts)So he is going to send a message.
3Hotdogs
(14,892 posts)Irish_Dem
(78,765 posts)popsdenver
(1,322 posts)or it interfered with one of his all expense paid corporate junkets for his wife and him.......
cstanleytech
(28,119 posts)Blasphemer
(3,561 posts)The only real solution is expanding the court once we have the Presidency and Congress back.
cstanleytech
(28,119 posts)My preferred method would be for a randomly selected Federal Judge is chosen and offered to sit for a single 9 year termon SCOTUS after which they are usually ineligible to serve as a Federal Judge at any level. They can decline to serve though on scotus if they so wish but they are then automatically removed from their current position and cannot ever be a judge at the Federal leve usually.
Staggering that you would see a new Judge every year and if a judge dies while serving then one of the ones that served before or declined to is randomly selected and offered to sit on the bench for the remainder of the term.
This way stacking SCOTUS is extremely difficult for any party to accomplish.