Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,559 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2025, 08:00 PM Monday

Clarence Thomas Sits Out Supreme Court Student Loan Case Decision

Source: Newsweek

Published Dec 08, 2025 at 11:00 AM EST updated Dec 08, 2025 at 12:52 PM EST


Justice Clarence Thomas did not participate in the Supreme Court's decision on a petition for rehearing concerning a student loan case, according to an order list released on Monday.

Why It Matters

The case, William F. Kaetz v. United States et al., marked a notable recusal in the ongoing national conversation over student debt and its legal implications.

Thomas is one of the longest-serving members of the Supreme Court. His recusal from student loan-related cases comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Court's handling of loan forgiveness initiatives, an issue that has significant financial and political implications for millions of Americans. Thomas’s past public comments about facing personal student loan debt have complicated his role as the Court examines the legality of loan relief.

What To Know

The Supreme Court's brief order did not provide a specific reason for Thomas’s recusal. Federal judicial ethics rules guide justices to abstain from cases where there may be a conflict of interest, personal involvement, or the appearance thereof.

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-sits-out-supreme-court-student-loan-case-decision-11174508

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

popsdenver

(1,322 posts)
7. Either that
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 12:26 AM
Tuesday

or it interfered with one of his all expense paid corporate junkets for his wife and him.......

Blasphemer

(3,561 posts)
8. I guarantee Alito & Thomas will resign while Trump is in office.
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 02:47 AM
Tuesday

The only real solution is expanding the court once we have the Presidency and Congress back.

cstanleytech

(28,119 posts)
9. That's the easiest way of course but I'd rather we have a complete revamp of SCOTUS.
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 03:31 AM
Tuesday

My preferred method would be for a randomly selected Federal Judge is chosen and offered to sit for a single 9 year termon SCOTUS after which they are usually ineligible to serve as a Federal Judge at any level. They can decline to serve though on scotus if they so wish but they are then automatically removed from their current position and cannot ever be a judge at the Federal leve usually.

Staggering that you would see a new Judge every year and if a judge dies while serving then one of the ones that served before or declined to is randomly selected and offered to sit on the bench for the remainder of the term.

This way stacking SCOTUS is extremely difficult for any party to accomplish.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clarence Thomas Sits Out ...