House Republicans confront Iran war and gas prices as they struggle to push economic agenda
Source: CNN Politics
PUBLISHED Mar 11, 2026, 6:00 AM ET
DORAL, Florida - Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team have been struggling to find consensus behind an election-year agenda to address Americans chief concerns over affordability and their cost-of-living. But now they have a new problem: Rising gas prices. After hammering Democrats relentlessly over $5-per-gallon gasoline, a threshold that was crossed when Joe Biden was president, Republicans are confronting a similar dilemma in the wake of President Donald Trumps decision to wage war against Iran.
Gas prices are threatening to spike indefinitely with the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint where roughly 20% of crude oil shipments pass through, virtually shut down as a result of the conflict. Republicans are left with this message: Just hope that the war ends soon and crude oil prices settle in time for November. Temporary blip, Johnson asserted. Snapshot in time, said Rep. Lisa McClain, the No. 4 House Republican. Short-term volatility, said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York.
Others like Rep. Mark Alford of Missouri said Republicans need to convince voters to stomach the pain. I think its our job to help bring people along to them and explain whats at stake, Alford said. Im willing to pay 30% or 30 cents more at the pump to make sure that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon thats going to hit the United States.
Its not what the GOP thought theyd be discussing weeks ago, as they hashed out their agenda for their three-day retreat here at Trumps golf resort in Doral. But as Iran is now dominating their focus, theyre running short on time and votes to execute their agenda.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/11/politics/republicans-gas-prices-iran-war-trump
Um no. The GOP AND the collusive media, simply BLASTED Biden 24/7, laughing along as miscreants pasted "I did that!" stickers all over pumps nationwide.
Make them feel the heat.
durablend
(9,193 posts)If the tables were turned they'd be screaming bloody murder and "30% or 30 cents more" would be way too much
Lovie777
(22,767 posts)the gas lighting of the republican party is strong.
gab13by13
(31,995 posts)What fucking Magat economic agenda? They got what they wanted from the Big ugly Death Bill. How the fuck can Congressional Magats give the rich any more money?
GreenWave
(12,569 posts)gab13by13
(31,995 posts)that's where Krasnov put the Venezuelan oil money he stole.
GreenWave
(12,569 posts)This pisses off the gullible. Already many are pissed that there is a war.
Buddyzbuddy
(2,467 posts)Which means that 30 cents looks like at least a $30,000 bite out of your $100,000 income, if your lucky enough to earn that.
That's what the Republican party wants you to accept because Netanyahu decided. And the strategy is to convince Americans, the threat of nuclear missiles to us was imminent.
Well, when you put it that way.
SWBTATTReg
(26,237 posts)Pete Hegseth's Defense Department blew $22M on steak and lobster in a single month, watchdog claims
modrepub
(4,067 posts)I swear the M$M can replace their journalists with AI bots or dictation apps because theres no follow up questions or analysis here.
First, didnt we have an inspection program that prevented Iran from getting a nuclear device? And what did that cost per day versus what we have now? Ill note one of the Republicans in this article said were at war, what do you expect?!?
Is anyone worried weve pissed off so many of our adversaries and allies someone is apt to just sell or give Iran a nuclear weapon at this point?
Ill end my rant by saying this whole situation is a shinning example of how costly war is economically verses trying to get along and showing some basic respect for each other.
BumRushDaShow
(168,727 posts)Per the LBN SOP - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=about&forum=1014
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread. On or after election days, discussion threads announcing that a race has been called are only permitted if the source is the Associated Press.
Probably half of CNN's main website is full of "analysis" articles, but if I posted that in here, it would be locked so fast that my head would be spinning.
City Lights
(25,713 posts)The only agenda they have is robbing the poor to give to the rich and keeping those Epstein files forever hidden.