Alleged Capitol Hill pipe bomber argues charges should be tossed out under Trump pardons

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: CBS News

Updated on: March 16, 2026 / 11:33 PM EDT


A man who was accused of planting pipe bombs outside the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee headquarters on the eve of the Jan. 6 attack in 2021 is asking a judge to dismiss the criminal charges against him, arguing he is covered by President Trump's sweeping pardons of alleged Jan. 6 rioters.

Monday's motion from lawyers for Brian Cole Jr. marks the latest twist in a case that remained unsolved for years — and the latest test of how extensively the Jan. 6 pardons could apply. His attorneys argued that the charges against Cole, who has pleaded not guilty, are "inextricably and demonstrably tethered" to the events of Jan. 6.

They pointed to filings by prosecutors that say Cole told the FBI he had traveled to Washington, D.C., to attend a 2020 election-related protest, which suggests he was part of "the same political controversy that animated the January 6 crowd." And they note that, even though the bombs were allegedly planted on Jan. 5, they were discovered on the following afternoon.

"The Pardon—like it or not—applies to Mr. Cole, based on the ordinary and plain meaning of the Pardon's language as applied to the relevant facts in this case," Cole's lawyers wrote.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alleged-pipe-bomber-trumps-jan-6-pardons-brian-cole/

[Irish_Dem]

1. Trump will outright pardon him for enough cash.

[intelpug]

2. Pipe bomber

Not a lawyer but I would say Trumps pardon covers events that occurred on Jan 6 at the capitol, Not distinctly different crimes that occurred the day before

[BumRushDaShow]

4. But then believe it or not

Tarrio wasn't in the Capitol on Jan. 6. He was there on the 5th but had been told that he was not allowed to set foot in the city (and he didn't). But he did his "planning" just outside in a parking garage!

And as we know, he got convicted of seditious conspiracy and then pardoned.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

3. Deadline Legal Blog-Why Trump's Jan. 6 pardon doesn't apply to alleged pipe bomb planter Brian Cole

Even if Cole’s alleged conduct is related to Jan. 6, 2021, his motion to dismiss still faces a fatal problem.

Why Trump’s Jan. 6 pardon doesn’t apply to alleged pipe bomb planter Brian Cole
Even if Cole’s alleged conduct is related to Jan. 6, 2021, his motion to dismiss still faces a fatal problem.
Read in MS NOW: apple.news/Ayx7uAHXaRCe...
‼️

— CVJ (@enuffsaysv.bsky.social) 2026-03-17T22:00:44.260Z

https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/why-trumps-jan-6-pardon-doesnt-apply-to-alleged-pipe-bomb-planter-brian-cole

President Donald Trump’s sweeping pardons for Jan. 6 defendants continue to generate litigation over how broadly they apply. The latest example comes from alleged Jan. 6 pipe bomb planter Brian Cole, who said the clemency “unequivocally applies” to him.

But there’s a simple reason for the courts to find that it doesn’t.

To understand why, let’s first look at the Jan. 20, 2025, proclamation’s text, which grants relief to three categories of people. First, it commutes sentences to time served for a list of people named in the order (Cole isn’t one of them). Second, it pardons “all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.” And third, it directs the attorney general to drop “all pending indictments against individuals for their conduct related to the events at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.”

So, before getting to the allegations against Cole, who has maintained his innocence, he faces a threshold issue: He doesn’t fit into any of those categories. He was charged in December 2025, long after Trump’s January order, and he hasn’t been convicted. Therefore, he was neither charged nor convicted at the time that Trump granted the pardon. .....

To be sure, had Cole been charged or convicted by the time Trump issued his proclamation, it wouldn’t have been ridiculous to argue that it covered him, even if that argument were not as airtight as his dismissal motion suggested.

But in any event, the timing is important enough that courts could rule against him on that threshold matter alone — that is, without deciding whether his alleged conduct qualifies as related enough to Jan. 6. Courts like not having to decide things they don’t have to when they don’t want to.

And though the government’s position on the pardon’s scope doesn’t dictate how the courts decide that scope, that the Trump DOJ brought this case shows that it doesn’t think Cole qualifies.

Of course, if the courts reject Cole’s motion to dismiss, Trump will be free to issue him a fresh pardon if he wants to. In fact, the president doesn’t have to wait for the courts to weigh in. He could do it today.

This is not my area of the law but on pure contract interpretation principles, trump's poorly worded pardon may not apply