Ohio Supreme Court finds attorney general erred in rejecting voting amendment based on title
Source: Associated Press
Ohio Supreme Court finds attorney general erred in rejecting voting amendment based on title
By JULIE CARR SMYTH
Updated 4:52 PM EDT, October 30, 2024
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) The Ohio Supreme Court delivered a blow to Republican Attorney General Dave Yost on Wednesday, ruling that he overstepped his authority by rejecting a voting-related amendments ballot petition solely because he objected to the title.
In a unanimous decision, the court sided with a coalition of civil rights organizations behind the Ohio Voters Bill of Rights and ordered Yost to revisit his January decision within 10 days.
Justices stopped short of ordering Yost to advance the constitutional amendment directly to the state Ballot Board, however, which is what plaintiffs had asked. Instead, they directed him to perform his duty and review the coalitions summary of the issue for fairness and accuracy.
The coalitions members, including the NAACPs Ohio chapter, A. Philip Randolph Institute and Ohio Organizing Collaborative, had initially hoped to place the measure on this years ballot. The package of election law changes responded to Ohios enactment last year of tougher photo ID requirements, shortened windows after Election Day for returning and curing ballots and other voting changes.
-snip-
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-amendment-ohio-court-56b7efe0df824780f89e445f1b72a037
live love laugh
(14,646 posts)Seems like a loss.
Demsrule86
(71,036 posts)the end. We are making progress...when I worked on the ballot fight to make abortion legal and in the Ohio constitution. I worked with GOP women, Democratic women and libertarians as well. It was a joint effort. The same is true for the anti-gerrymandering attempt. There were men of all political demographics involved in the effort as well.