Why did Bidenomics fail to deliver at the polls? - WaPo
So many things about the strategy made so much sense. The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan at the dawn of Joe Bidens presidency, which prevented a surge in poverty and joblessness as the covid-19 pandemic ravaged the economy, looked like exactly the right bet especially given memories of the Obama administrations timid response to the housing crisis of 2008 and the deep recession that ensued. The burst of industrial policy that followed (the Chips and Science Act, the bipartisan infrastructure law, the Inflation Reduction Act) appeared equally adroit a strategy to address the plight of the many White workers without a college degree who turned out for Donald Trump in 2016 and, as conventional wisdom would have it, were devastated by the culling of factory jobs.
(snip)
But Dani Rodrik, an economist at Harvards Kennedy School, has, to my mind, the most compelling proposition: Bidenomics idea of the working class is outdated by a few decades.
Manufacturing employs only about 13 million of the nearly 160 million workers toiling outside of farms. Fewer than 1.4 million of those are represented by unions. The industrial policies and the trade barriers, speeches at the picket line and talk of factories returning to left-behind rural areas, were all aimed at a small corner of American society.
A policy that promises to restore the middle class by bringing manufacturing back is not only unrealistic, Rodrik wrote for Project Syndicate. It also rings hollow, because it does not align with workers aspirations and everyday experiences.
There are nearly 16 million workers in retail trade, 17 million in leisure and hospitality, almost 18 million in health care. For sure, they benefited from some of Bidens policies. But incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act for contractors to work with union labor did nothing for them. So perhaps the lesson for some future Democratic administration hoping to assist the working class is not necessarily that populist policies dont work. It is that these policies need to be aimed at what America has become, not what it was a bunch of decades ago.
https://wapo.st/4iVc7uU
elleng
(137,254 posts)question everything
(49,269 posts)Today definition of a working class is different. We have stopped being a manufacturing society in the 70s so to tailor programs to a manufacturing economy misses the goal.
elleng
(137,254 posts)tulipsandroses
(6,321 posts)he fell off his bicycle, his shoes, how slow he walks, anything but his accomplishments.
doc03
(37,097 posts)you were out of work inflation hits everyone. I think thar was the main reason Jimmy Carter lost in1980.
Fiendish Thingy
(19,017 posts)Its under 3% now.
People are morons.
MichMan
(13,729 posts)The fact that it came down in the last year doesn't erase that fact.
doc03
(37,097 posts)unless there is recession. What we experienced the last couple years was nothing compared with the 70s.
Walleye
(36,735 posts)ColinC
(11,061 posts)MichMan
(13,729 posts)ColinC
(11,061 posts)It couldn't have lost if she didn't even run on it.
MichMan
(13,729 posts)Harris (and the Biden administration for that matter) quit using the word "Bidenomics" as their name for the economy during his presidency. Not saying it was fair, but that is how it goes when you are in charge.
ColinC
(11,061 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2024, 10:30 PM - Edit history (1)
Or promote it any meaningful way.
mitch96
(14,815 posts)Even Biden said he should have signed the covid stimulus checks..
m
Chemical Bill
(2,650 posts)Yes, the WaPo is part of the answer to the question posed, but one must include the NYT, Faux News, Xitter, etc.
We don't even need to read the article when the answer is given by the title and the source.
Bill
lees1975
(6,170 posts)Nobody knew anything about Bidenomics. There was a failure to communicate anything the Biden administration was doing, successfully by the way, to fight inflation which was what cause people to vote GOP. The Biden administration was somehow unable, either through their own ineffectiveness, or because the media was too busy covering everything Trump to get their message out there.
I am wondering if someone will come up with research to show how covered up the Biden administration was by media coverage of Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump. It has to be some kind of historic record. We didn't lose by anywhere near enough votes for this academic explanation to be correct.
We did a lot of things wrong, including that three week period of caterwauling, pearl clutching and screeching over the debate between Biden and Trump. We're still paying too much attention to political tradition and protocols that cost us at the polls. We should have stuck with the original plan, for Biden to be a transitional president, and focused on a reform candidate from the start.
Silent Type
(7,574 posts)and it still didnt help on Nov 5th. Im not sure what else the media could do even if it wanted to undermine trump.
dpibel
(3,456 posts)I'm not so sure about that.
Nor am I sure whatever mention of those matters was even close to as loud as Joe Biden's alleged senility.
Silent Type
(7,574 posts)dpibel
(3,456 posts)Six months before the election.
There was a lot of breathless coverage of his near-death experience in Butler. But I don't think that's what you're talking about.
Historic NY
(38,189 posts)MichMan
(13,729 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2024, 01:01 AM - Edit history (1)
Only about 10% of the labor force is unionized. The other 90 % don't care about things like card check, or support of picket lines. I'm not sure if the rank & file even really care about card check since many work for employers that were unionized 50 years ago or more.
Blue_Tires
(57,248 posts)Because this is EXACTLY the fucking strategy Donnie rode to victory in 2016... EVERY fucking news channel and pundit bashed Hillary for not reaching out to the factory workers in the flyover states who had their jobs outsourced overseas... Hell, it's still a strategy Bernie Sanders uses now and last I checked, nobody is criticizing him for it...
Blue_Tires
(57,248 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 30, 2024, 01:48 PM - Edit history (1)
A black woman was carrying the flag for it instead of a white man, and too many voters couldn't handle that... End of story.
Walleye
(36,735 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,532 posts)Prices shot up in 22-23, and people were hurting. It wasn't Biden's fault, but as the incumbent, he's going to get hit with the blame.
Trying to coin the term Bidenomics when a large swatch of the country was really hurting financially was a poor PR decision. I get what they were trying to do, they needed to change the narrative on the economy because it was becoming a liability, but I ultimately think it came across as tone deaf.
Scubamatt
(99 posts)The Media need only look in the mirror to understand why; they insisted on constantly reporting how terrible everything supposedly was, how old/incompetent Biden supposedly was and how disconnected the Democrats supposedly were from the public. The media shaped the message for four years and this is now white-washing to absolve how complicit they ere with the Right.