Iowa
Related: About this forumIn rare 3-3 decision, Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law largely banning abortion
In rare 3-3 decision, Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law largely banning abortionOPINION
In a rare 3-3 split decision, the Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 2019 district court ruling that blocked the law. The latest ruling comes roughly a year after the same body and the U.S. Supreme Court determined that women do not have a fundamental constitutional right to abortion.
The blocked law bans abortions once cardiac activity can be detected, usually around six weeks of pregnancy and before many women know they are pregnant.
Writing for the three justices who denied the state's request to reinstate the law, Justice Thomas Waterman said granting that request would mean bypassing the legislature, changing the standard for how the court reviews laws and then dissolving an injunction.
In our view it is legislating from the bench to take a statute that was moribund when it was enacted and has been enjoined for four years and then to put it in effect, Waterman wrote.
Link to tweet
raging moderate
(4,520 posts)The change was based on ignorance of the actual physical facts. What is called "around six weeks of pregnancy" is actually only about FOUR weeks of pregnancy, since it has been customary to start the count at the first day of the woman's previous period, but we now know that ovulation and fertilization do not occur until two weeks later. Also, recent studies show that the "cardiac activity" was not actually heart activity, and that there is no heart at that point. We need to spread these facts, because many people are afraid to allow abortion at a point when they think the embryo has all these functioning organs and sentience.
LiberalFighter
(53,521 posts)I doubt the general public has any idea about the ovulation and fertilization process. I would say that unless the person is an OBGYN I doubt anyone has an idea. Even some of them likely don't.
This needs to be publicized more.
rurallib
(63,293 posts)to ban abortions.
I bet she is really pissed off at the SC right now.
She picked 5 of the 7 and Branstad picked the other 2
IA8IT
(5,929 posts)We got judges that need to be judged evil and voted out..... Stinking Louie Gohmert, Steve King, and repubicans started a stampede of the stupid ejecting three supreme court after same sex marriage ruling.
I want my Iowa back!!
rsdsharp
(10,291 posts)rurallib
(63,293 posts)I stopped in the middle of my tracks when I heard this on the radio
rsdsharp
(10,291 posts)rurallib
(63,293 posts)Corporate Kimmy is pissed off:
To say that todays lack of action by the Iowa Supreme Court is a disappointment is an understatement, Reynolds said in a release, adding she believed there was no fundamental right to abortion in Iowa or US law.
But the fight is not over, she continued, noting she and others were reviewing our options in preparation for continuing the fight.
https://iowastartingline.com/2023/06/16/iowa-lawmakers-react-to-decision-that-keeps-abortion-legal/.