Texas
Related: About this forumHow to Flip Texas by 2030
The District Action Council Model Presents an Opportunity to Turn Texas Blue for a Generation
https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/how-to-flip-texas-by-2030
Texas Democrats are tired.
The Texas Democratic Party has lost every statewide race since 1994.
The Texas Senate has been in Republican hands since 1996.
The Texas House? Since 2002.
Why do we keep losing? Get a focus group of ten Democratic activists in a room, and youll get fifteen responses:
Its a messaging problem! We arent speaking to rural communities!
Its a messaging problem! Were not speaking to people in the cities!
Were too liberal!
Were not organized!
We need to speak about kitchen table issues!
We need to engage Gen Z!
The state is too gerrymandered!
Its because of voter suppression!
Greg Abbott is suppressing the vote!
While all of these challenges may (or may not) have merit, I would contend that one of the major overlooked causes that can truly be solved and agreed upon is the electoral organizing model
which is currently more broken than Greg Abbotts moral compass.
Wednesdays
(20,317 posts)With the help of ChatGPT, I summarized the article:
The article discusses the challenges and potential solutions for progressive activists and groups in Texas to achieve more effective political organizing and flipping seats in elections. It highlights the differences in campaign strategies between incumbents and non-incumbents, where incumbents enjoy continuous visibility and media coverage due to their positions. On the other hand, non-incumbents often struggle with disengagement until the primary elections are over, after which the ground game efforts begin.
The author introduces the concept of "District Action Councils" as a model for high-octane organizing. District Action Councils are coalitions of grassroots organizations, local Democratic clubs, labor unions, and PACs working together under a common, web-based calendar of events to engage voters and flip seats. These councils provide a platform for different groups to collaborate while maintaining their individual interests. By forming these councils before primaries, progressive groups can build infrastructure, raise funds, and establish relationships in a peaceful and collaborative manner, giving them a head start on the election process.
The article provides examples of successful District Action Councils in other states. For instance, in California, grassroots activists successfully flipped several congressional districts by forming similar coalitions that focused on community-oriented canvassing and collaboration. The author suggests that Texas, with its own set of challenges and ongoing issues, is well-suited for this model of organizing. Texas has experienced numerous crises and traumas, from environmental disasters to political controversies, which have energized and mobilized communities.
The author acknowledges the difficulty of the task, with many seats having seemingly insurmountable margins, but argues that several factors make these seats more vulnerable than they might appear. Many incumbent representatives have faced scandals or made unpopular decisions, while the shifting political landscape and increased activism among Texas residents provide opportunities for change. The article also emphasizes the importance of collaboration among neighboring counties and districts to amplify efforts and create a united front.
The ultimate goal, as the article states, is to change Texas, which in turn could lead to broader national and global impacts. By flipping seats, engaging voters, and building a strong organizing infrastructure, activists aim to promote democracy, address climate change, and create positive change on a larger scale.
In conclusion, the article underscores the challenges and opportunities facing progressive activists in Texas, advocating for the adoption of District Action Councils as a strategy to drive effective organizing efforts, collaboration, and the pursuit of meaningful change.