Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
Related: About this forumDowning Street rewrote 'independent' report on race, experts claim
Commissioners allege No 10 distorted their work on inequality, after conclusions played down institutional racism
The Observer has been told that significant sections of the report published on 31 March, which were criticised and debunked by health professionals, academics, business chiefs and crime experts, were not written by the 12 commissioners who were appointed last July.
The 258-page document was not made available to be read in full or signed off by the group, which included scientist and BBC broadcaster Maggie Aderin-Pocock and Samir Shah, former chair of the Runnymede Trust, nor were they made aware of its 24 final recommendations. Instead, the finished report, it is alleged, was produced by No 10.
Kunle Olulode, an anti-racism activist and director of the charity Voice4Change, is the first commissioner to condemn the government publicly for its lack of transparency. In a statement to the Observer, Olulodes charity was scathing of the way evidence was cherrypicked, distorted and denied in the final document.
The report does not give enough to show its understanding of institutional or structural discrimination evidence in sections, that assertive conclusions are based on, is selective, it said. The report gives no clear direction on what expectations of the role of public institutions and political leadership should be in tackling race and ethnic disparities. What is the role of the state in this?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/apr/11/downing-street-rewrote-independent-report-on-race-experts-claim
The Observer has been told that significant sections of the report published on 31 March, which were criticised and debunked by health professionals, academics, business chiefs and crime experts, were not written by the 12 commissioners who were appointed last July.
The 258-page document was not made available to be read in full or signed off by the group, which included scientist and BBC broadcaster Maggie Aderin-Pocock and Samir Shah, former chair of the Runnymede Trust, nor were they made aware of its 24 final recommendations. Instead, the finished report, it is alleged, was produced by No 10.
Kunle Olulode, an anti-racism activist and director of the charity Voice4Change, is the first commissioner to condemn the government publicly for its lack of transparency. In a statement to the Observer, Olulodes charity was scathing of the way evidence was cherrypicked, distorted and denied in the final document.
The report does not give enough to show its understanding of institutional or structural discrimination evidence in sections, that assertive conclusions are based on, is selective, it said. The report gives no clear direction on what expectations of the role of public institutions and political leadership should be in tackling race and ethnic disparities. What is the role of the state in this?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/apr/11/downing-street-rewrote-independent-report-on-race-experts-claim
Oh, what a surprise. A Tory government uses some minority names to give them cover, while writing the report to whitewash the results, thus exonerating Tories from accusations of institutional racism over the Windrush scandal and other problems.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Downing Street rewrote 'independent' report on race, experts claim (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2021
OP
LeftishBrit
(41,307 posts)1. I am SHOCKED (well, actually I'm not!)
efhmc
(15,046 posts)2. When I saw this article on Twitter,
I hooted. It is so blatantly false as to be laughable.
T_i_B
(14,810 posts)3. One very worrying result of all this..
Is that more and more people are going to distrust any future government reports. Essentially when they have the most comforting conclusions possible for the government.
Richard_GB
(81 posts)4. Clearly the assumption made by the Tories
Is that their supporters are gullible. An assumption that was reinforced by Brexit.