Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(68,476 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:53 PM Feb 2012

The worst app install in which I was ever involved.

Last edited Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:23 PM - Edit history (1)

My son is back in school, as a nursing student. He wanted to install a study guide that was on disk. It said the media was for PC and Mac. It mentioned Windows 7 and OS X 10.4 or higher. The Mac version is "Universal," not Power PC or Intel.

The total install was about 229 MB. It crashed twice on his less-than-1-year-old MBPro running Snow Leopard. Each crash was after 30 minutes of the slowest install I ever saw. We tried in on my even newer MBPro and on Sparkly's older MBPro. All with the same results. We are now well over two hours into this mess. I finally try it on my nearly four year old Mac Pro (Double Quad Core Xeon and 14 GB Ram running Snow Leopard). In less than 10 minutes it was installed.

I copied the app from my Applications Folder to his desktop and then to his Applications folder.

It runs fine.

I never encountered a more difficult app to install. Have you?

Also, as a "Universal" app, will it run under Lion?




edit to change 229 GB to 229 MB

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The worst app install in which I was ever involved. (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Feb 2012 OP
A 229GB install seems impossible Renew Deal Feb 2012 #1
Yes, MB not GB Stinky The Clown Feb 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Feb 2012 #2
It was 229 MB, not GB Stinky The Clown Feb 2012 #4
Lion will not run PPC apps; since this is says 10.4 and above, it will may run REP Feb 2012 #5
Isn't a "Universal" app one this is neutral and will run on both Intel and PPC without . . . . . Stinky The Clown Feb 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Feb 2012 #7
Probably some shitty third party "custom installer program" emulatorloo Mar 2012 #8

Response to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Stinky The Clown

(68,476 posts)
4. It was 229 MB, not GB
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:20 PM
Feb 2012

As for looping, what I can say is the drive kept spooling up for a few seconds then slowing. Then spooling up, then slowing. Over and over.

Also, the progress bar move in huge chunks, not slowly and steadily. 16.2 MB . . . . . 48.6 MB . . . . . 97.8 MB . . . . . etc.

REP

(21,691 posts)
5. Lion will not run PPC apps; since this is says 10.4 and above, it will may run
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:40 PM
Feb 2012

Tiger was the first version of OS X built to run on the Intel chip set.

Stinky The Clown

(68,476 posts)
6. Isn't a "Universal" app one this is neutral and will run on both Intel and PPC without . . . . .
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 05:44 PM
Feb 2012

. . . . (whatever you actually call it) some sort of OS translator/emulator/imitator?

I think I read that Universal apps will run on Lion. This shows in the software section of his system profiler as being Universal, not PPC.

Response to Stinky The Clown (Reply #6)

emulatorloo

(45,596 posts)
8. Probably some shitty third party "custom installer program"
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 10:43 AM
Mar 2012

In other words, Windows on the Mac.

Rather than the bog standard Apple app installer.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Apple Users»The worst app install in ...