Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(73,428 posts)
Wed May 31, 2017, 04:32 PM May 2017

Hillary Clinton Is Furious. And Resigned. And Funny. And Worried.

Good profile interview.



Hillary Clinton Is Furious. And Resigned. And Funny. And Worried.


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/hillary-clinton-life-after-election.html

The surreal post-election life of the woman who would have been president.

By Rebecca Traister

Photographs by Lynsey Addario


Hillary backstage at a speech in May.



May 26, 2017 2:36 pm


When I walk into the Chappaqua dining room in which Hillary Clinton is spending her days working on her new book, I am greeted by a vision from the past..........................


.......“I am less surprised than I am worried,” she says of the Comey firing. “Not that he shouldn’t have been disciplined. And certainly the Trump campaign relished everything that was done to me in July and then particularly in October.” But “having said that, I think what’s going on now is an effort to derail and bury the Russia inquiry, and I think that’s terrible for our country.”

It will be days before newspapers report that Trump asked Comey to move away from the Russia investigation prior to firing him, but the implications are already clear. History, says Clinton, “will judge whoever’s in Congress now as to how they respond to what was an attack on our country. It wasn’t the kind of horrible, physical attack we saw on 9/11 or Pearl Harbor, but it was an attack by an aggressive adversary who had been probing for many years to figure out how to undermine our democracy, influence our politics, even our elections.” Her hope, in the wake of Comey’s dismissal, is that “this abrupt and distressing action will raise enough questions in the minds of Republicans for them to conclude that it is worthy of careful attention, because left unchecked … this will not just bite Democrats, or me; this will undermine our electoral system.”


Talking about Comey, even the day after his firing, is a risky thing for Clinton to do. The last time she did it was in a conversation a week earlier with CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour at a Manhattan lunchtime gala for Women for Women International. Amanpour had asked Clinton about why she thought she had lost the election. “I take absolute personal responsibility,” Clinton replied. “I was the candidate, I was the person who was on the ballot. I am very aware of the challenges, the problems, the shortfalls that we had.” But she had also talked about other factors she believes contributed, citing FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver’s research on the impact of Comey’s October 28 letter. “If the election had been on October 27,” she said, “I’d be your president.”

After the exchange, Clinton and her aides had appeared upbeat. The crowd had been enthusiastic, and there was a sense that Clinton had done something that she has long found difficult in public: She had been herself — brassy, frank, funny, and pissed. But on cable news and social media, another reaction was taking shape. The New York Times’ Glenn Thrush, who has reported on Clinton for years, tweeted “mea culpa-not so much,” suggesting that the former candidate “blames everyone but self.” Obama-campaign strategist turned pundit David Axelrod gave an interview claiming that while Clinton “said the words ‘I’m responsible’ … everything else suggested that she really doesn’t feel that way.” Joe Scarborough called her comments “pathetic”; David Gregory suggested she was not “taking real responsibility for the fact that she was not what the country wanted.” And in the Daily News, Gersh Kuntzman delivered a column that began, “Hey, Hillary Clinton, shut the f— up and go away already.”

Later, Amanpour would tell me how surprised she was by the negative reaction. “The idea that she shouldn’t mention the Comey letter when the entire nation and the most respected statisticians are considering its impact is so strange,” she said. “If she were a man, would she be allowed to mention it? As a woman, I am offended by the double standards applied here. Everyone shrieks that Hillary was a bad candidate, but was Trump a good candidate?”.....................

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SunSeeker

(54,080 posts)
2. She is not allowed to state facts; a panel of talking heads on MSNBC just said she "sounded bitter."
Wed May 31, 2017, 06:06 PM
May 2017

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
3. Well now she can sound anyway she wants.
Wed May 31, 2017, 06:20 PM
May 2017

The beauty of not running for office anymore is you can say what is on your mind. Besides, 538 agrees that Comey's letter swung the election. Hillary is RIGHT. Her campaign wasn't perfect, but there were factors outside her control. But they think she should wear sackcloth and ashes for eternity to atone for her femaleness.

SunSeeker

(54,080 posts)
4. She's the only one to date to really lay out how the Trump/Russia collusion worked.
Wed May 31, 2017, 11:21 PM
May 2017

Up to now, it seems the media keep reporting leaked bits of the story, without explaining the significance and how it fit into and enabled the Trump/Russia collusion to subvert the election.

I hope Hillary keeps talking. We really need her to!

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
5. I think she was screwed over worse than any candidate for president ever.
Thu Jul 13, 2017, 02:25 PM
Jul 2017

Which is a separate, and not a contradictory, issue from how she ran her campaign.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Hillary Clinton Is Furiou...