Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
Related: About this forumSnap Files Lawsuit After Yearslong Effort to Trademark 'Spectacles'
That sound you hear is me scratching my head.
Snap, the parent company of the social-media app Snapchat, has sued the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office over its rejection to trademark the word spectacles for the companys wearable smart glasses
Link to tweet
Snap Files Lawsuit After Yearslong Effort to Trademark Spectacles
The social-media company is suing the patent office over its rejection of a trademark for Snapchats wearable smart glasses.
The social-media company is suing the patent office over its rejection of a trademark for Snapchats wearable smart glasses.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Snap Files Lawsuit After Yearslong Effort to Trademark 'Spectacles' (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 2022
OP
That's a ridiculous lawsuit. "Spectacles" is a generic term, can't be trademarked
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2022
#1
Bernardo de La Paz
(51,767 posts)1. That's a ridiculous lawsuit. "Spectacles" is a generic term, can't be trademarked
It's not like "Windows", which was a metaphor, not a literal term. (However, windows was a software term used for a few years prior to Microsoft building on the research of Xerox PARC.)
It would be like somebody trying to trademark "Automobile" for a car brand. If you had, say, a walking exercise app, you could trademark that as AutoMobile because that would be a metaphor, not a literal term.
Eugene
(62,823 posts)2. "Spectacles" is a synonym for eyeglasses, used especially in Commonwealth countries.
They are not only trying to trademark a common noun, it's a common term in that very marketplace.
This is like trying to trademark "tyre" or "bonnet" for automotive use.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,013 posts)3. You don't need X-Ray Specs to see through this.
Source: https://pixels.com/featured/x-ray-specs-100-reinvintaged.html
Also see: X-Ray Spex
and
X-ray specs