Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(61,213 posts)
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 06:29 AM Nov 26

Oh Well!!! House Bill Will Crack Down On "Subersive Activities" By Non-Profits, Like Opposing Oil & Gas Development

Democrats just helped Republicans give President-elect Donald Trump the potential power to shut down nonprofits under the guise of fighting terrorism — while GOP lawmakers have quietly revealed a new blueprint for defunding organizations they disagree with. Earlier this month, the House Energy and Commerce Committee laid out a plan to target environmental justice nonprofits and organizations working to transition the economy away from fossil fuels.

That report preceded a major House vote on Thursday in which Republicans and 15 Democrats passed legislation giving the Treasury Department the power to strip nonprofit news organizations, advocacy groups, and universities of their tax-exempt status. The Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act was originally proposed last year, ostensibly to prevent U.S. nonprofits from supporting groups like Hamas after widespread protests over Israel’s invasion of Gaza. Nicknamed the “nonprofit killer,” it gives the president unprecedented authority to go after political opponents. Advocacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union warned of the bill’s potential “to grant the executive branch extraordinary power… based on a unilateral accusation of wrongdoing.”

After an essentially identical bill failed to pass last week, the newly approved bill now goes to the Senate for a vote. In the preceding weeks, the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s report focused on the Inflation Reduction Act’s distribution of federal funding, offering a preview of how the new terrorism legislation could be wielded for political purposes. It also highlighted the kinds of organizations that could be targeted, including those that support clean-energy policies like committing investments to renewable energy, phasing out fossil fuel production and use, and expanding public land conservation.

Criticizing the Biden administration’s environmental justice grants for marginalized groups historically inundated by pollution, the report says, “Enriching nonprofit organizations to spread radical, left-leaning ideology is an inappropriate use of taxpayer dollars.” The plan singles out specific groups that the committee says have pushed a “radical rush-to-green agenda,” including Rewiring America, a nonprofit working on electrification, and New York City-based environmental justice group WE ACT. It castigated, for example, a blog post on WE ACT’s website “criticizing ‘Republican gas stove culture wars,’ and House GOP Members’ ‘preformative [sic], out-of-touch agenda.’”

EDIT

https://www.levernews.com/gop-takes-first-steps-to-shut-down-climate-groups/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Well!!! House Bill Will Crack Down On "Subersive Activities" By Non-Profits, Like Opposing Oil & Gas Development (Original Post) hatrack Nov 26 OP
There's a line separating free speech and free association and no_hypocrisy Nov 26 #1
There's a game autocrats eventually get around to playing Mike 03 Nov 26 #2

no_hypocrisy

(49,234 posts)
1. There's a line separating free speech and free association and
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 07:02 AM
Nov 26

violence and intimidation.

Unless the issue appears before the current panel on SCOTUS.

Mike 03

(17,385 posts)
2. There's a game autocrats eventually get around to playing
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 07:05 AM
Nov 26

It's playing fast and loose with the definition of "terrorist", or maybe expanding it to include "unpatriotic activities" or "criticism of the current administration." So an environmentalist who runs or has a prominent role in an ecological organization becomes a "terrorist". I don't want to list the names of the organizations I worry about to give them any ideas.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oh Well!!! House Bill Wi...