Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(61,363 posts)
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 01:26 PM Dec 13

Thought For A Sec This Forbes Article Was Actually About Greenwashing. Nope, It's About Branding.

In today's environmentally conscious consumer landscape (Ed. - ), brands are under increasing pressure to showcase their sustainability efforts. However, the rise of greenwashing—the practice of making misleading or false claims about a product's environmental benefits—has undermined trust and credibility. As sustainability becomes a key purchasing factor, brands must navigate this delicate terrain carefully to build genuine, lasting connections with their eco-aware audiences. The Do's and Don'ts outlined in this guide will help brands avoid the pitfalls of greenwashing and cultivate authentic, impactful, eco-friendly branding.

EDIT

Educate And Engage Your Audience

Example: Patagonia's "Worn Wear" program educates consumers on the environmental impact of clothing production and the benefits of buying used or repairing items. By empowering customers with knowledge, the brand fosters a deeper understanding of sustainability and strengthens its reputation as a responsible industry leader.
Tip: Use your brand platforms to share informative content about sustainability issues, the reasoning behind your eco-initiatives and the collective impact consumers can make. Engaged, informed customers are more likely to support your brand's sustainability efforts.

EDIT

Don't Hide Negative Environmental Impacts

Example: BP's "Beyond Petroleum" campaign promoted the company as a renewable energy pioneer, even as oil remained its core business. This dissonance between the brand's claims and its primary operations led to widespread skepticism and damaged public trust. Tip: Be transparent about areas where your brand's sustainability efforts fall short. Acknowledge challenges and outline your plans for improvement rather than glossing over negative environmental impacts.
Don't Rush To Rebrand Without Substantial Change

Example: McDonald's' decision to adopt green-colored logos in Europe was perceived as a superficial attempt at greenwashing, as it lacked tangible evidence of significant environmental impact reduction at the time. Tip: Ensure that any rebranding or marketing efforts around sustainability are backed by measurable, impactful changes to your business practices. Avoid premature or cosmetic updates that do little to demonstrate your genuine commitment to eco-responsibility.

EDIT

https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2024/12/10/navigating-greenwashing-a-practical-guide-for-brands/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thought For A Sec This Forbes Article Was Actually About Greenwashing. Nope, It's About Branding. (Original Post) hatrack Dec 13 OP
Some products, by their very nature, can never be "green." hunter Dec 13 #1
Need to think in terms of "relatively green" OKIsItJustMe Dec 13 #2

hunter

(39,121 posts)
1. Some products, by their very nature, can never be "green."
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 02:37 PM
Dec 13

Abundant supplies of natural gas, for example, are probably going to destroy whatever remains of earth's natural environment as we've known it. Natural gas is not "green."

Automobile culture is never going to be "green."

Neither are the factory farm meat and dairy industries.

Biofuels are not "green." Aside from burning fossil fuels, agriculture is the most environmentally destructive activity humans engage in.

Destroying fragile desert environments for solar "farms" is not "green."

Etc..

We all need food, clean water, and comfortable shelter but with 8 billion humans sharing the planet we've got to provide for these needs with the smallest environmental impacts possible.

Consumerism itself isn't "green."

OKIsItJustMe

(21,031 posts)
2. Need to think in terms of "relatively green"
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 03:09 PM
Dec 13

Which is better? Electricity generated by burning coal? or electricity generated by wind turbines?

https://www.audubon.org/news/wind-power-and-birds

Wind Power and Birds
Properly sited wind power can help protect birds from climate change.

Tundra Swans. Photo: Donald M. Jones/Minden

By National Audubon Society
Published July 21, 2020
Audubon strongly supports wind energy that is sited and operated properly to avoid, minimize, and mitigate effectively for the impacts on birds, other wildlife, and the places they need now and in the future. To that end, we support the development of wind energy to achieve 100% clean electricity.

Wind power is an important source of renewable, carbon-free energy that is critical to replacing and reducing emissions from fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas that cause warming of our planet.

All forms of energy—including wind power—have impacts on birds. Audubon’s role is to make sure that key species and high conservation areas for birds are protected as much as possible and in accordance with federal law. We engage in advocacy on federal, state, and local energy planning processes, and on individual utility-scale projects. Audubon also weighs in on federal permitting policies for species protected by the Endangered Species Act, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Why does Audubon support properly sited wind power?

Top scientific experts from around the world, including Audubon's own scientists, agree that the effects of climate change are happening now and will get worse if warming is not limited to 1.5 degrees C. Expansion of renewable and carbon-free energy is an essential piece of meeting this goal, and wind power is currently one of the most economically competitive forms of renewable energy. Beyond the climate impacts, wind power also avoids air pollution caused by fossil fuel combustion that disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of color.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Thought For A Sec This Fo...