Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThought For A Sec This Forbes Article Was Actually About Greenwashing. Nope, It's About Branding.
In today's environmentally conscious consumer landscape (Ed. - ), brands are under increasing pressure to showcase their sustainability efforts. However, the rise of greenwashingthe practice of making misleading or false claims about a product's environmental benefitshas undermined trust and credibility. As sustainability becomes a key purchasing factor, brands must navigate this delicate terrain carefully to build genuine, lasting connections with their eco-aware audiences. The Do's and Don'ts outlined in this guide will help brands avoid the pitfalls of greenwashing and cultivate authentic, impactful, eco-friendly branding.
EDIT
Educate And Engage Your Audience
Example: Patagonia's "Worn Wear" program educates consumers on the environmental impact of clothing production and the benefits of buying used or repairing items. By empowering customers with knowledge, the brand fosters a deeper understanding of sustainability and strengthens its reputation as a responsible industry leader.
Tip: Use your brand platforms to share informative content about sustainability issues, the reasoning behind your eco-initiatives and the collective impact consumers can make. Engaged, informed customers are more likely to support your brand's sustainability efforts.
EDIT
Don't Hide Negative Environmental Impacts
Example: BP's "Beyond Petroleum" campaign promoted the company as a renewable energy pioneer, even as oil remained its core business. This dissonance between the brand's claims and its primary operations led to widespread skepticism and damaged public trust. Tip: Be transparent about areas where your brand's sustainability efforts fall short. Acknowledge challenges and outline your plans for improvement rather than glossing over negative environmental impacts.
Don't Rush To Rebrand Without Substantial Change
Example: McDonald's' decision to adopt green-colored logos in Europe was perceived as a superficial attempt at greenwashing, as it lacked tangible evidence of significant environmental impact reduction at the time. Tip: Ensure that any rebranding or marketing efforts around sustainability are backed by measurable, impactful changes to your business practices. Avoid premature or cosmetic updates that do little to demonstrate your genuine commitment to eco-responsibility.
EDIT
https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2024/12/10/navigating-greenwashing-a-practical-guide-for-brands/
hunter
(39,121 posts)Abundant supplies of natural gas, for example, are probably going to destroy whatever remains of earth's natural environment as we've known it. Natural gas is not "green."
Automobile culture is never going to be "green."
Neither are the factory farm meat and dairy industries.
Biofuels are not "green." Aside from burning fossil fuels, agriculture is the most environmentally destructive activity humans engage in.
Destroying fragile desert environments for solar "farms" is not "green."
Etc..
We all need food, clean water, and comfortable shelter but with 8 billion humans sharing the planet we've got to provide for these needs with the smallest environmental impacts possible.
Consumerism itself isn't "green."
OKIsItJustMe
(21,031 posts)Which is better? Electricity generated by burning coal? or electricity generated by wind turbines?
https://www.audubon.org/news/wind-power-and-birds
Properly sited wind power can help protect birds from climate change.
Tundra Swans. Photo: Donald M. Jones/Minden
By National Audubon Society
Published July 21, 2020
Audubon strongly supports wind energy that is sited and operated properly to avoid, minimize, and mitigate effectively for the impacts on birds, other wildlife, and the places they need now and in the future. To that end, we support the development of wind energy to achieve 100% clean electricity.
Wind power is an important source of renewable, carbon-free energy that is critical to replacing and reducing emissions from fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas that cause warming of our planet.
All forms of energyincluding wind powerhave impacts on birds. Audubons role is to make sure that key species and high conservation areas for birds are protected as much as possible and in accordance with federal law. We engage in advocacy on federal, state, and local energy planning processes, and on individual utility-scale projects. Audubon also weighs in on federal permitting policies for species protected by the Endangered Species Act, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Why does Audubon support properly sited wind power?
Top scientific experts from around the world, including Audubon's own scientists, agree that the effects of climate change are happening now and will get worse if warming is not limited to 1.5 degrees C. Expansion of renewable and carbon-free energy is an essential piece of meeting this goal, and wind power is currently one of the most economically competitive forms of renewable energy. Beyond the climate impacts, wind power also avoids air pollution caused by fossil fuel combustion that disproportionately affects low-income communities and communities of color.