Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumPOLITICS & HISTORY: Women Against Women's Suffrage
The fight for womens suffrage is often depicted as pitting women against men. But some women made it their lifes mission to campaign against it.
By: Livia Gershon July 6, 2023
Read a typical textbook account of the US womens suffrage fight, and you might come away with the impression of a battle of the sexes. But, historian Joe C. Miller argues that thats a serious distortion. In fact, not only was the campaign to give women the vote taken up by plenty of men, but there was widespread opposition to the cause among women.
Miller notes that suffragists frequently opposed referendums in which women would have the opportunity to vote on the issue, tacitly acknowledging that their cause would be unlikely to prevail. For example, in 1871, Susan B. Anthony said that womens condition of servitude meant that they shouldnt be polled in a proposed Washington State vote. Even at the time of the Nineteenth Amendments ratification in 1920, suffragist Carrie Chapman Catt wrote in a letter that only about a third of women supported suffrage, another third was opposed, and the rest didnt care either way. (This wasnt the message Catt sent to the public, though. Publicly, she claimed that most women wanted the vote.)
Some antis also warned that if women became more like men in their public roles it would threaten their existing special privileges.
And it wasnt just apolitical or conservative women who opposed suffrage. Antis, as they were sometimes known, included leaders in womens education as well as prominent professional figures such as journalist Ida Tarbell. Among the most active was Josephine Dodge, an advocate for child care for working mothers. In 1911, Dodge and some allies formed the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. The all-female organization peaked at about 500,000 members in 1919.
Why did women oppose suffrage? For some, Miller writes, it was part of a larger hostility to the expansion of the franchise to constituencies they saw as ignorant or liable to sell their votes, such as immigrants and Black Americans.
https://daily.jstor.org/women-against-womens-suffrage/
( I posted this primarily due to my total revulsion for Moms for Liberty. History is a tool for learning, let's hope we can minimize the damage from hatred and ignorance..evidently always ongoing. )
stopdiggin
(13,122 posts)'Movements' have had a variety of, not only internal struggle and disagreement, but concerns over potential allies and alliances ... It isn't all a march forward.
That's humanity - and that's history.
Scrivener7
(53,470 posts)the ones who are financially dependent on white men and therefore want the status quo of white male entitlement to thrive. This group would have a large overlap with christian fundamentalist groups.
I think in the old days, some of the women bought into what was said about them: that they were not capable of rational thinking. And some, rightfully, might have been concerned about the very low educational levels of women, though there were no educational requirements for male voters.
It would be interesting to poll female republiQan voters to see how many are financially dependent on their husbands.