Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
Related: About this forumIf men could menstruate
http://www.haverford.edu/psych/ddavis/p109g/steinem.menstruate.html
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If men could menstruate (Original Post)
libodem
Mar 2014
OP
libodem
(19,288 posts)1. An oldie but a goodie
charmay
(525 posts)2. I first read this in college over 30 years ago. It's still relevant.
libodem
(19,288 posts)4. I'd seen it before
But thought it was still relevant, too. It would be a contest of who could soak the most maxi pads.
I just wish a few nonbelievers could have a days worth of cramps to get some empathy.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)6. This is funny because it has the ring of truth:
Generals, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation ("men-struation" as proof that only men could serve God and country in combat ("You have to give blood to take blood" , occupy high political office ("Can women be properly fierce without a monthly cycle governed by the planet Mars?" , be priests, ministers, God Himself ("He gave this blood for our sins" , or rabbis ("Without a monthly purge of impurities, women are unclean" .
Male liberals and radicals, however, would insist that women are equal, just different; and that any woman could join their ranks if only she were willing to recognize the primacy of menstrual rights ("Everything else is a single issue" or self-inflict a major wound every month ("You must give blood for the revolution" .
Street guys would invent slang ("He's a three-pad man" and "give fives" on the corner with some exchenge like, "Man you lookin' good!"
"Yeah, man, I'm on the rag!"
Male liberals and radicals, however, would insist that women are equal, just different; and that any woman could join their ranks if only she were willing to recognize the primacy of menstrual rights ("Everything else is a single issue" or self-inflict a major wound every month ("You must give blood for the revolution" .
Street guys would invent slang ("He's a three-pad man" and "give fives" on the corner with some exchenge like, "Man you lookin' good!"
"Yeah, man, I'm on the rag!"
libodem
(19,288 posts)7. It would be their time
To be relegated to the "moon hut". I think some countries still have a similar concept about keeping women out of the public during that time of the month. Some religious practices do, too.
mercuryblues
(15,269 posts)3. loved this
"In short, we would discover, as we should already, that logic is in the eye of the logician. (For instance, here's an idea for theorists and logicians: if women are supposed to be less rational and more emotional at the beginning of our menstrual cycle when the female hormone is at its lowest level, then why isn't it logical to say that, in those few days, women behave the most like the way men behave all month long? I leave further improvisation up to you.)
The truth is that, if men could menstruate, the power justifications would go on and on
."
I read yesterday : If men could get pregnant, birth control pills would be sold out of gumball machines and taste like bacon.
libodem
(19,288 posts)5. That is great stuff!