Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
Related: About this forumPorn stars: NO more damaged than the rest of us
A report finds adult actresses are happier than the rest of us -- and that being naked might lead to self-esteem
BY TRACY CLARK-FLORY
A common stereotype of a female porn star is an insecure, sexually abused, mentally ill and/or drug-addled woman. Its one supported by anecdotes (most memorably by Linda Lovelaces harrowing autobiography) and rhetoric (the feminist scholar Catharine MacKinnon went so far as to claim that all porn actresses were sexually abused as children). But as for actual research? Eh, not so much.
Now, a new study claims to have debunked this truism, which is known as the damaged goods hypothesis.
Some performers were amused by the news. As a happy, healthy female porn performer, my reaction is: thanks, science, thanks so much for proving I am real, says writer and porn performer Lorelei Lee in an email.
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Porn stars: NO more damaged than the rest of us (Original Post)
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2012
OP
Fearless
(18,458 posts)1. That report will likely rustle some feathers.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)3. it did. though i wish the feathers read the report
before they started pecking at me. sometimes people are incredibly dumb.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)2. I think you have to be comfortable in your own skin enough to show off like that.
So, it makes sense to me.