Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(115,880 posts)
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 07:39 PM Dec 2011

A novel method for the removal of ear cerumen

Last edited Sun Dec 18, 2011, 09:12 PM - Edit history (1)

Please note, this is a spoof, satire. CMAJ writes this sort of stuff for their Dec issue, making light of things in a medical terminology way.

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/173/12/1496.full?sid=ec0414d5-a337-41cd-b430-f5e146944127

We describe the off-label use of a recreational device (the Super Soaker Max-D 5000) in the alleviation of a socially emergent ear condition.

A 45-year-old male complained of a profound reduction in his left ear acuity while staying at an island cottage in rural Ontario. His hearing loss was reducing his ability to hear his newborn son cry in the middle of the night, requiring his wife to carry out all late-night child care. As a result, correction of the problem was considered urgent.

The patient had been swimming multiple times a day for 6 days. He had had several ear infections as a child but was otherwise well. He admitted having used a Q-tip in his ear “once or twice” recently in the affected ear.

An otoscope being available, examination of the external ears was conducted. The nature of his problem was revealed as bilaterally impacted cement-like ear cerumen....(much more @ link, worth reading if you like humor)

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A novel method for the removal of ear cerumen (Original Post) uppityperson Dec 2011 OP
And be sure to read the comments. This is not recommended by doctors. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #1
It is in their Dec issue, CMAJ, where they do spoof reports uppityperson Dec 2011 #2
Oh, good! n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #3

Bolo Boffin

(23,872 posts)
1. And be sure to read the comments. This is not recommended by doctors.
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 08:33 PM
Dec 2011

If water pics are not recommended because of the damage to the inner ear, this water cannon must be even worse.

uppityperson

(115,880 posts)
2. It is in their Dec issue, CMAJ, where they do spoof reports
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 09:10 PM
Dec 2011

Heard it on the radio today and had to look it up.

NOT recommended to do this, in case someone takes it seriously.

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Deaf/Hard of Hearing»A novel method for the re...