Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Thaddeus

(353 posts)
Fri Jul 4, 2014, 08:16 PM Jul 2014

Wither(ing) Journalism?

July 1, 2014 — The journalism crisis continues. Yet, as so often happens when social problems require structural reform, once the alarm bells fell silent—as they did after the sudden 2008–2009 downturn—our sense of urgency subsided. As with the broader financial system, whose collapse accelerated the fourth estate’s decline, the status quo has reasserted itself after being jolted. Previous warnings now seem hyperbolic and ideas for bold reforms have faded from view. Meanwhile, the number of newspaper journalists in the US has fallen by approximately a third since 2000, and continues to drop. All this transpires at a time of historic inequality and pending environmental collapse when a strong press is desperately needed to expose problems, their causes, and their solutions.

Simultaneously, there’s a growing exuberance around new digital experiments. Exhibit A for promising new models is The Intercept, launched by Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Jeremy Scahill. The Intercept is the first project of First Look Media, a 501(c)3 nonprofit funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, who has promised to invest $250 million in the venture. Committed to editorial independence, First Look’s expanding network of digital magazines will provide “the kind of autonomy that is too often undermined by the demands of advertisers and investors.” Although it will aggressively seek out revenues to sustain its work, its not-for-profit model offers a structural alternative, one that privileges journalism over profit imperatives while focusing on hard-hitting investigative reporting. Other for-profit ventures—sometimes grouped together as “personal-brand journalism”—are Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight (owned by ESPN) and Ezra Klein’s Vox (owned by Vox Media). No doubt even more initiatives like these will emerge, promoting data-driven explanatory journalism. But even if we agree that these new experiments are most welcome, will they suffice? Can new digital start-ups fill the journalism vacuum?

[For the rest of the essay: http://www.publicbooks.org/nonfiction/withering-journalism ]

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wither(ing) Journalism? (Original Post) Thaddeus Jul 2014 OP
Thanks, Thaddeus. Here's a link to the whole piece. hedda_foil Jul 2014 #1
Thanks! Thaddeus Jul 2014 #2
"Can new digital start-ups fill the journalism vacuum?" snot Jul 2014 #3
True, loss of NN is a big problem... Thaddeus Jul 2014 #4
Agreed. snot Jul 2014 #5

snot

(10,820 posts)
3. "Can new digital start-ups fill the journalism vacuum?"
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 09:41 AM
Jul 2014

It's been doing that for a while . . . but with the dismantling of net neutrality, prospects don't look good for it to last.

Thaddeus

(353 posts)
4. True, loss of NN is a big problem...
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 01:40 PM
Jul 2014

...that many fail to connect with journalism-related issues. But I'm also not convinced that digital start-ups are making up for losses. Certainly they're not in terms of numbers of reporters or revenue.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»Wither(ing) Journalism?