Science
Related: About this forumGeoffrey Hinton upgrades the possibilty of AI causing our extinction in 30 years
The British-Canadian computer scientist often touted as a godfather of artificial intelligence has shortened the odds of AI wiping out humanity over the next three decades, warning the pace of change in the technology is much faster than expected.
Prof Geoffrey Hinton, who this year was awarded the Nobel prize in physics for his work in AI, said there was a 10 to 20 per cent chance that AI would lead to human extinction within the next three decades. Previously Hinton had said there was a 10% chance of the technology triggering a catastrophic outcome for humanity.
Asked on BBC Radio 4s Today programme if he had changed his analysis of a potential AI apocalypse and the one in 10 chance of it happening, he said: Not really, 10 to 20 [per cent].
Hintons estimate prompted Todays guest editor, the former chancellor Sajid Javid, to say youre going up, to which Hinton replied: If anything. You see, weve never had to deal with things more intelligent than ourselves before.
Entire article:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/27/godfather-of-ai-raises-odds-of-the-technology-wiping-out-humanity-over-next-30-years
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To me the real problem is we have too many greedy or stupid people making the decisions that affect us all.
Srkdqltr
(7,782 posts)Which 10 or 20%? It's easy to say this stuff with no specifics.
Jim__
(14,504 posts)From wikipedia
As AI technology democratizes, it may become easier to engineer more contagious and lethal pathogens. This could enable people with limited skills in synthetic biology to engage in bioterrorism. Dual-use technology that is useful for medicine could be repurposed to create weapons.[56]
For example, in 2022, scientists modified an AI system originally intended for generating non-toxic, therapeutic molecules with the purpose of creating new drugs. The researchers adjusted the system so that toxicity is rewarded rather than penalized. This simple change enabled the AI system to create, in six hours, 40,000 candidate molecules for chemical warfare, including known and novel molecules.[56][61]
...
You could also think about lethal autonomous weapons
If the actions of such AI systems themselves don't directly wipe out humanity, they could cause international incidents that escalate into war.
Orrex
(64,334 posts)Not a chance of wiping out 10% to 20% of us.
If this starts to happen, Congress will act fast to shield itself from consequences, and their next move will be to guarantee that student loans must still be paid. Next theyll protect billionaires assets and holdings.
The Madcap
(599 posts)promoting stupidity. Based on what I've seen so far, it doesn't appear to be very good at anything other than regurgitating old info and drawing hands with six fingers. I don't see it as taking over so much as dumbing us down into oblivion.
KPN
(16,169 posts)it -- but it's efficient, useful and seems to be accurate.
The Madcap
(599 posts)to deliberately provide an AI response. Nor do I have Chat-GPT set up on my desktop. Maybe that's the issue. Microsoft CoPilot AI is pretty bad, but I don't really use it that much. Every time I try to get it to do anything, it always seems to come back with some kind of response like "I can't do that" or "That's not appropriate." It's very much trying not to offend anyone or anything in the slightest. Not good for funny memes.
essaynnc
(874 posts)AI has Asimov's 3 laws of robotics totally ingrained???? No harm to humans, no harm to itself, etc.
Srkdqltr
(7,782 posts)anciano
(1,606 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,531 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,746 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,998 posts)The story of how Ted Faro (Elon Musk) destroys all life on the planet for greed.
2naSalit
(93,529 posts)As long as they don't completely destroy the biosphere first.
KPN
(16,169 posts)How could it be otherwise? So the questions are: how well will humanity protect itself? And in that context, how do we define "well" -- what does it look like?
Hope the past 4 to 5 decades aren't indicative.