Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumAyaan Hirsi Ali: Islam's most devastating critic
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ayaan-hirsi-ali-islams-most-devastating-critic-10169031.htmlIn the US, where she lives with her husband, the outspoken Scottish historian Niall Ferguson, she has just published her latest tirade against her one-time faith, Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now. Islam is not a religion of peace, she writes, but one that foments terrorism, breeds sectarian conflict and sanctions the repression of women and minorities. The book seeks to identify what must change in Islam to permit the separation of politics and religion and bring about a peaceful and tolerant faith and how the West might hasten the process.
...
When you live the way I live, she told CNN days after the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, you have to ask yourself over and over: who are these people who try to kill me? What do they want? What drives them? This is not a group of deranged thugs. Its an ideology embedded in a world religion. For me to be safe, I have to outlive a generation whose minds are contaminated with it.
Funny how some give this brave woman more hate than they do to vicious murderers, whom they make excuses for.
Cartoonist
(7,558 posts)She has a slapdown coming.
GeorgeGist
(25,456 posts)onager
(9,356 posts)Some of our resident Brits should probably weigh in on this one. I'm just an ignorant Colonial myself.
Ferguson's ex (and the mother of their 3 kids) was a former editor of the Daily Mail and Sunday Times. She also worked at Conde Nasty publications.
In any case, that divorce was a glorious train wreck for the British society types. Here's a brief article about it from Business Insider, of all places:
http://www.businessinsider.com/niall-ferguson-is-ditching-his-wife-for-a-young-hot-feminist-and-politcal-war-refugee-2010-2
ETA - more juicy details, from the D.M. itself. The Ferguson/Ali/Douglas axis apparently wrecked some Conservative political plans:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249095/The-history-man-fatwa-girl-How-David-Cameron-news-think-tank-guru-Niall-Ferguson-deserted-wife-Sue-Douglas-Somali-feminist.html
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)and sanctions the repression of women and minorities.
Primarily because it is true. The correct thing to do is to shut up about all of that and if pressed claim that other factors are causing the observed phenomena.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Isn't that the common retort to people who say that Islam is not a religion of peace?
Truth hurts.
nil desperandum
(654 posts)you are correct, and as I discovered you can get hidden by a jury for pointing it out here in the atheists section apparently...
I guess I misunderstood the concept of safe haven....thought pointing out the issues with muslims and islam was obvious.
As with charlie hebdo it's clear muslims are easily offended and as you point out create some seriously dangerous conditions for those who offend their tender sensibilities.
All religions suffer from the desire to stifle dissent to be sure, but islam has a lock on the body count these days if one is being honest about how islam reacts to dissent or criticism.
My apologies to those who are offended by that concept, but I would encourage you to read the papers from the ME and discover the large body count for yourself.
For the record there is no god as there is no evidence beyond that for santa claus to support the god theory.
If someone is offended by that I don't know what else to say....except that it's not hateful when it's fact.
It would appear you are correct in that many would prefer you to shut up...
RussBLib
(9,713 posts)as anyone can alert on a post, if I understand the rules correctly, but I do not fully understand all the rules.
Don't let the hide bother you. In many ways, it's a red badge of courage.
nil desperandum
(654 posts)for the kind words. In reading the pinned stuff I now understand your point and will endeavor to point out when I am being sarcastic with an appropriate emoji lest I be forever branded the bigot.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)It's God hypotheses, theory is way out of reach for em.
Sometimes it helps to put a disclaimer in a distinctly A&A post of where it's being posted. They do it in other boards, but mostly so people don't post if they know they're unwanted, here we do it because we're being watched and they'll alert on whatever will stick.
(Title line meant in jest)
RussBLib
(9,713 posts)I read her first book Infidel. It was captivating. It was great to see a Muslim woman standing up to the Islamic nonsense, and she didn't seem all that hawkish on war against Islam.
Since then I have heard and seen some yellow flags of caution on Ayaan. She became a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and has been aligning herself with neocon hawks like Richard Perle and is a big Netanyahu supporter. Rightwingers love her. She became very hawkish on all-out war with Islam.
I detest the barbarity of ISIS and the general stupidity and cruelty of Islam probably as much as anyone here, but I don't think we need to dive into another fucking war, especially one pitting one religion against another, and she seems to insist upon it.
I've lost my admiration for Ayaan.
Some interesting info here, at the Institute for Policy Studies and their Right Web. I'm sure you can find other threads.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)While AEI is a conservative think-tank, they have taken on liberal fellows (probably not as left as we would like them, but still). Plus, she held office in the Netherlands under their Labour Party.
I'm not sure what to think of her, but at this point I'm pretty damned cautious.
onager
(9,356 posts)I just invented the term "DU Problem." You're welcome!
Translation - she ended up at AEI because she was so critical of Islam, no Left-leaning think tank would dare hire her. You know, sort of the same way it works in Certain DU Groups - if you specifically criticize a bunch of barbarians for cutting off people's heads, you're viciously attacking all the good peaceful Muslims ALL OVER THE WORLD. And are clearly a racist shit-lord or something.
Ali explains it herself in this Patheos interview. Bonus Shitlordery - with Sam Harris!
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2014/05/09/why-its-insane-that-much-of-the-left-rejects-ayaan-hirsi-ali-and-sam-harris-as-their-liberal-bedfellows/
WARNING: FULL ASSHOLE MODE: in the past few years, I've seen many blog blowhards attacking atheism for being a den of Old Rich White Cis-Het Male Bla-Bla-Bla. And endlessly preaching that we need more women and minorities in atheism.
I agree with that 100%. And it seems to be working. e.g., Atheist Ireland keeps a list of 1,500 atheist women willing to publicly speak on the subject.
But recently we've had Ayaan Hirsi Ali attacked for various shortcomings. And Jamila Bey - a Black atheist woman - attacked for speaking to the Conservative Political Action Committee.
So I can't quite figure out what "movement atheism" - whatever that may be - is saying.
But it seems uncomfortably close to something like this: "Yes, we want more women and minority atheists to speak out. But only if they agree with us 100%. Otherwise they should STFU and stay in the back of the bus."
If that is the approach, I don't think it's going to work very well.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)If Hirsi Ali can't get a job in a liberal think-tank, it probably has more to do with liberalism in general than it does with liberal atheists.