Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumSecretary Of State Antony Blinken Takes Oath On Constitution Instead Of Bible
"Good News: In a symbolic victory for secular values, new Secretary Of State Antony Blinken takes the oath of office on a copy of the U.S. Constitution, instead of the Bible.
The New York Times reports:
Vice President Kamala Harris delivered the oath of office to Antony J. Blinken on Wednesday, his first full day leading the State Department.
Photos from the event show Blinken taking the oath of office on a copy of the U.S. Constitution."
(more at link, including video of the ceremony)
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2021/01/secretary-of-state-antony-blinken-takes-oath-on-constitution-instead-of-bible/
I do not know what his beliefs are, but it's nice to see this.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I would do the same if I had the courage and the opportunity.
-Laelth
Ferrets are Cool
(21,998 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I like that!
Ferrets are Cool
(21,998 posts)joshdawg
(2,725 posts)The best-selling book of fiction ever.
Duppers
(28,260 posts)Thank you for the info.
👍
Jerry2144
(2,636 posts)I would choose the phone book. More accurate than the Bible and symbolic of the people I would be representing
Mr. Blinkens beliefs have nothing to do with his oath to the country. All Federal officials should take the oath with their hand on the Constitution. It sickens me that some officials take it so lightly and turn their back on the oath so quickly.
Denvermosaic
(121 posts)angrychair
(9,900 posts)We've been making kids pledge to the Christian God since 1953 and unfortunately most people don't care.
LazySusanNot
(192 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 1, 2021, 04:56 PM - Edit history (1)
Regardless of his religious views, I like the strategic move. So much of what we do in Govt and Society as a whole is based on symbolism. I think The Constitution is probably the greatest symbol he could have chosen, especially now.
Thanks for posting this.
The symbolism is re-inforced every time it's brought into the light.
SpankMe
(3,319 posts)AirmensMom
(14,830 posts)Says to in the Constitution. We do need to know that he believes in the U.S. Constitution. Very refreshing!
BigOleDummy
(2,274 posts)And well said!
leanforward
(1,080 posts)I all in on that. Makes me think of how the french achieved their separation.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,813 posts)Govt officials following the dos ands don'ts of the Constitution, or adhering to the tenets of the Bible?
IronLionZion
(47,133 posts)There's no need for any book, but the constitution makes the most sense since it is explicitly cited in the oath.
panfluteman
(2,168 posts)The whole swearing on a Bible thing must be particularly mixed and ambivalent for Jews, with half of the book - the Old Testament - being OK, but the other half - the New Testament - being inherently problematic.
3catwoman3
(25,695 posts)Most appropriate, for many reasons.
ailsagirl
(23,870 posts)Besides, it really makes more sense than using the Bible since it's the Constitution they must uphold.
IMHO
Glaisne
(546 posts)More should do this!
yonder
(10,008 posts)because another recent appointee did the same?
This is really great and about time the tables were turned.