Well, whad'ya know. Contrary to popular belief, GMOs aren't banned in 60 counties.
Ran across this on a science blog.
A: Cathy Enright, former executive director of the Council for Biotechnology Information, has provided a response to a similar question. Below is a previously posted response that addresses the topics your question raises.
Im aware of only one country, Kenya, with a ban in place on GMO food imports. The decision came about in November 2012, apparently during a cabinet meeting, that circumvented the existing Kenyan Biosafety Act and the National Biosafety Authority, the regulatory agency established to regulate the use of GMOs.
Every other country that has a regulatory system in place for GMOs allows GMOs to be imported for food and animal feed, including the European Union (EU), which has a thorough and comprehensive regulatory system for the assessment and approval of GMOs (EU law).
EFSAs FAQ on genetically modified organisms is available here.
EFSA director statement on GMO Food.
In fact, the EUs safety assessment process for GMOs is largely similar to that of other countries around the world Japan, China, Brazil, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States and many, many others. Each has determined that GMOs are substantially equivalent to their non-GMO counterparts.
I think people may incorrectly perceive that the EU has a ban on GMOs for food and animal feed because of polarized public opinion and extended delays in the EU approval process, particularly the final step a political decision-making process in which the member states vote on the European Food Safety Authority (ESFA) scientific opinion. By mid-2011, 39 GM products were approved for food and feed use in the EU, with 72 approvals pending due to delays in the regulatory process.
Despite the GMO controversy in the EU, it imports 72 percent (2011) of the protein-rich feed needed to support its livestock industry from Brazil, Argentina and the United States, the vast majority of which is GMO.
More at: https://gmoanswers.com/ask/how-many-countries-ban-gmos
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Don't know what the "60" number is about. But the article you posted seems to not cover what's on Wiki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_genetically_modified_organisms_in_the_European_Union#Adoption_of_GMO_crops
zalinda
(5,621 posts)of what GMO is and means. GMO (to my mind) is a classification where gene splicing is used to import a quality into an organism that would not be able to be introduced by hybridization.
The Amflora potato would more be considered as a hybrid, not a GMO, although it's genes may have been altered.
It is a sticky situation and there should be a standardization of all these terms.
Z
progressoid
(50,858 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)...you seem to remember that number being thrown about on DU.
OK.
BUT, THE REST OF THE WORLD BANS GMOS; RIGHT?
http://www.thefarmersdaughterusa.com/2014/04/but-rest-of-world-bans-gmos-right.html
no, the EU does not ban GMOs
http://www.themindrestrained.org/columns/gmo/dear-american-anti-gmo-activists-no-the-eu-does-not-ban-gmos-they-love-importing-them/
With G.M.O. Policies, Europe Turns Against Science
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/opinion/sunday/with-gmo-policies-europe-turns-against-science.html?_r=0
Wilms
(26,795 posts)If someones statement may need some clarification, the adult thing to do is provide it. Scoundrels, however, may use it for a straw man argument.
But scoundrels are what they are.
Speaking of scoundrels, here's a bit about the author (who referred to a number of European countries as a "Coalition of the Ignorant" of that NYT opinion piece you linked.
http://www.alternet.org/food/uncovering-real-story-behind-mark-lynas-conversion-climate-change-journalist-cheerleader
Huck, what's so great about GMO food? Is it that big a deal? That's before we address what scoundrels the likes of Monsanto are.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Alternet is not a good source for science stories. Not even close. Mark Lynas is an ethical advocate. The hit piece you posted is completely FOS. It's time to realize that the anti-GMO movement is unethical, ignorant, and downright despicable. If you're going to bash Lynas, then you've chosen the wrong side of science, history, the environment, and ethics. The reality is that the anti-GMO movement can't win in actual science-based discussion, so it resorts to lame attempts at personal attacks, utilizing some very ugly slight of hand "connections" as if that changes the reality. It's ugly to the core. If you support it, then you have no business in this group.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Please read my post above. It says, "banned". Did they get it wrong?
Wilms
(26,795 posts)You wanna be so scientificy, but refuse to play by the rules. Here are the cites. You don't have to like them. I'm not going to act like they don't exist.
Berlin yesterday (14 April) joined France, Greece, Hungary and other EU countries opposed to GM crop cultivation by ordering a ban on Monsantos MON 810 maize, despite European rulings that the biotech grain is safe.
http://www.euractiv.com/section/science-policymaking/news/germany-joins-ranks-of-anti-gmo-countries/
EU lawyers take action against Poland over GMO ban
http://uk.reuters.com/article/environment-eu-poland-gmo-dc-idUKL3191435020080131
Bulgaria parliament bans GMO crops to soothe fears
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-gmo-idUSTRE62H3EJ20100318
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And all of that political BS is very recent, oh and none of those places ban the importation of the stuff. Whoops.
It's time to wake up. You've been conned, and your condescension doesn't change that. Honesty matters, and the anti-GMO movement is the absolute perfect example of dishonest scumbags.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Now, our opinions differ.