Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hoo boy ... we've got a new one in the Science Group.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/122844660 (locked thread)http://www.democraticunderground.com/122844678
Apparently, there's some "new" "scientific" theory that planets start out "puffy" and collapse like soufflés. All sorts of "unexplained anomalies" (which apparently haven't been noticed by anyone else) are UNIQUELY explained by this radical new theory ! And yet, strangely enough, there seems to be only a single researcher supporting this theory ! See the link within the first link above to see how the "dogma" of constant planet size was "justified" by plate tectonics -- i.e. before plate tectonics came along apparently no one assumed the planets weren't constantly changing in size.
Hope this doesn't last as long as the Electric Universe episode.
links and excerpts from pseudoscientific, anti-vaccination, alt-med, or creationist sites are permitted only for the purposes of criticism.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hoo boy ... we've got a new one in the Science Group. (Original Post)
eppur_se_muova
Jan 2016
OP
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)1. "Hoo boy" is right!
Nothing like new "theories" to explain what old theories already explain thoroughly.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)2. Where the hell do they get this stuff?
Rather, where do they get the brains that believe it?
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)3. Usually when I hear talk about time being relative
it's because someone is running late.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)6. Over Time, the Earth Seemed To Crystallized.
Physicists investigate the structure of time, with implications for quantum mechanics and philosophy
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-02-physicists-implications-quantum-mechanics-philosophy.html#jCp
Since it is an unproven Law or Principle, I am posting this in the SS&P Group.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3884-4/fulltext.html
In my opinion, there is more matter on the planet that will undergo crystallization.
progressoid
(50,858 posts)4. Well that's...um....interesting.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)5. Why not banned this DhhD person from the Science Group?
Last edited Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:53 AM - Edit history (1)
http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/243/art%253A10.1140%252Fepjc%252Fs10052-016-3884-4.pdf?originUrl=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1140%2Fepjc%2Fs10052-016-3884-4&token2=exp=1454432945~acl=%2Fstatic%2Fpdf%2F243%2Fart%25253A10.1140%25252Fepjc%25252Fs10052-016-3884-4.pdf%3ForiginUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Flink.springer.com%252Farticle%252F10.1140%252Fepjc%252Fs10052-016-3884-4*~hmac=f3d103080b03221ad80a14d15698354260c4959f28250e1799d71e61cceb5949snip
In other words, time behaves like a crystal. As an application of our formalism, we analyze the effect of such a deformation on the rate of spontaneous emission in a hydrogen atom.