Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumA Man Is Facing Jail for Harassing Women Online, and It's a Big Deal
Excellent news out of Canada.
A Toronto man named Gregory Alan Elliott was arrested and charged two years ago with criminal harassment for threatening messages he allegedly sent to women via Twitter. His case finally began in a Toronto court yesterday. If convicted, he could face jail time.
It's a heartening development for women whose professional and personal lives are heavily taxed by the specter of online abuse. Traditional law enforcement channels (not always on the cutting edge of new social media technology) often don't take internet-based harassment seriously, because it seems to exist only in an intangible playground and because our culture's "boys will be boys"/"don't feed the trolls" apologia is so aggressive. The line where online attacks cross over into real-life danger is muddy and ill-defined for most peopleeven, quite often, victims themselves. Is this real? Am I being oversensitive? Am I installing an alarm system in my house because some 13-year-old boy in Ohio is bored? How many rape threats is too many? Should I get a dog? Should I tell people why I got a dog?
Elliott was reportedly arrested after a woman claimed he repeatedly contacted her on Twitter in a manner that caused her to feel afraid, and "continued doing so even after she asked him to stop." After she came forward, several other women spoke up and said that they had also been harassed by Elliott . . . .
Elliott's case echoes yesterday's conviction of two UK-based internet trolls who sent threatening messages to journalist and activist Caroline Criado-Perez. The pair pleaded guilty to sending "menacing" tweets "over a public communications network."
Regardless of your stance on prosecuting online hate speech and/or explicit threats, we, as a society, need to start accepting the fact that the internet is real. The internet is not a fantasyland without consequencesit's a real place of real joy and real danger where real flesh-and-blood people exchange real ideas and real threats. Figuring out how to regulate that (especially in America, a nation with freedom of speech built so deeply into its fundament) is going to be a long, messy road.
It's a heartening development for women whose professional and personal lives are heavily taxed by the specter of online abuse. Traditional law enforcement channels (not always on the cutting edge of new social media technology) often don't take internet-based harassment seriously, because it seems to exist only in an intangible playground and because our culture's "boys will be boys"/"don't feed the trolls" apologia is so aggressive. The line where online attacks cross over into real-life danger is muddy and ill-defined for most peopleeven, quite often, victims themselves. Is this real? Am I being oversensitive? Am I installing an alarm system in my house because some 13-year-old boy in Ohio is bored? How many rape threats is too many? Should I get a dog? Should I tell people why I got a dog?
Elliott was reportedly arrested after a woman claimed he repeatedly contacted her on Twitter in a manner that caused her to feel afraid, and "continued doing so even after she asked him to stop." After she came forward, several other women spoke up and said that they had also been harassed by Elliott . . . .
Elliott's case echoes yesterday's conviction of two UK-based internet trolls who sent threatening messages to journalist and activist Caroline Criado-Perez. The pair pleaded guilty to sending "menacing" tweets "over a public communications network."
Regardless of your stance on prosecuting online hate speech and/or explicit threats, we, as a society, need to start accepting the fact that the internet is real. The internet is not a fantasyland without consequencesit's a real place of real joy and real danger where real flesh-and-blood people exchange real ideas and real threats. Figuring out how to regulate that (especially in America, a nation with freedom of speech built so deeply into its fundament) is going to be a long, messy road.
http://jezebel.com/a-man-is-facing-jail-for-harassing-women-online-and-it-1497322836?utm_campaign=socialflow_jezebel_facebook&utm_source=jezebel_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Man Is Facing Jail for Harassing Women Online, and It's a Big Deal (Original Post)
BainsBane
Jan 2014
OP
threats of violence are not legitimate free speech. They're criminal activity. nt
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#1
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. threats of violence are not legitimate free speech. They're criminal activity. nt
ismnotwasm
(42,478 posts)2. Good.
It's about time.
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)3. Great. Kicked and recced.
May this be a first sentence. And may many others follow if people continue to harass women online.