History of Feminism
Related: About this forumQuestion from a good Guy friend of mine
I'm at work and can't answer him properly, but what do you guys think?
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)People will give their girl a boy's name before they'll give their boy a girl's name.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)They become girl names.
Shirley and carrol come to mind off the top,of my head.
BainsBane
(54,936 posts)The only thing it would change is when someone has your name and doesn't know who you are, like in a job application. Once people met in person, any equalization resulting from name ambiguity would be null.
ismnotwasm
(42,478 posts)The more interesting the name, the more unisex it tends to be
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)I don't think there's anything wrong with gendered stuff. I like the differences between the genders. The only problem is the power structure propping up one of them, and the sexist culture that a lot of people are brought up in. If we can work on taking those down, then it will be easier to see even gendered names as positive, I think.
Even gender neutral names carry certain expectations. For some reason, (in my experience at least) people think that when you have a gender neutral name it means you must be a guy.
I mean, your example could just as easily be "go as her, go ask him.", because we also expect different things simply from knowing their pronouns. If we have to weed out gendered names, we'd also have to weed out gendered pronouns to avoid the same expectations. Plus we'd have to restructure the whole language so that "man" was not the default that means "human"... Plus a bunch of other things to make the language more gender neutral. Wouldn't it be better to change the culture that kids are brought up in, so they can appreciate the wonderful differences between people instead of judging them for them?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)than of masculinity or femininity per se.
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)I think that gender binarism has something to do with. When people automatically try to fit people into box x or y, instead of entertaining the idea that there are more alternatives than just "stereotypically woman" and "stereotypically male" gender roles, you end up with questions like in the OP.
BainsBane
(54,936 posts)I suppose you all noticed the evil feminists OPs in GD.
ismnotwasm
(42,478 posts)I'll read it once in a while and snicker. I even posted a couple of times. Then I show it to some coworkers, probably shouldn't because it's not DU's finest hour.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)But I will say that the online dating thread is a real eye-opener.
BainsBane
(54,936 posts)Well it make me nauseous?
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Nausea may or may not coincide.
BainsBane
(54,936 posts)but rather confirmation of what I already knew. No surprises for me in that thread.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Let's ask Pat!
ismnotwasm
(42,478 posts)Like the name Corey, or Chris or Jamie
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)or religious or ethnic equality so long as non-WASPS get names that end in vowels.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)Never ever name your daughter something "girly" if you want her to make it in business.
If you want to increase the odds of of a lesser life use one of those names ending in "y" or "ie" - you know the ones - . . No offense intended to anyone with said name, but you probably know what I'm talking about when I say, you are treated differently because of your name. You know you are.
BainsBane
(54,936 posts)Any different treatment has to do with gender, of which a name is only a marker.
JustAnotherGen
(33,853 posts)IRL my name is Adrienne. It's a unisex name - though men in American tend to have it spelled Adrian. And often my name gets confused with the male version on email chains - and then people in the company meet/speak to me and are surprised I'm a woman. But their treatment of me does not change.
Though . . . if you are familiar with the program Entourage - I've been getting called Adrienne Gold since 2006 around here.
And I'm okay with that - because ambition, bold language, risk taking, and demanding flawless execution of co-workers are female traits.
ismnotwasm
(42,478 posts)The female. Interesting question, American names are boring; anyway
His reply
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)I think that societal expectations associated with gender is the root cause of the problem... so any assumptions we make by hearing a name that we consider to be "gendered" are just things made up in our head. It would be cool to shake that up more often with A Boy Named Sue (love me some Johnny Cash), and girls named Bob, but I don't think that stripping people of gender identity = equality.
Even with my complete lack of gender identity, and no understanding of what it means to feel "female", I recognize that having a gender seems to be an integral part of most people's identity and folks shouldn't have to mask or abandon that in order to be "equal".
Though I think it would be cool if there were very "feminine" women running around named Frank, George, and Justin; and very "masculine" men running around named Maria, Juliette, and Roxanne... I don't think the naming is the root of the problem. But switching up names might raise some awareness that the problem of expectation of proper/normal gender behavior runs so deep.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)does that make you a gender traitor?
Sorry, couldn't resist.
cheap shots and all.