History of Feminism
Related: About this forumListen up, wimmin! It's all our fault!
While we were busy talking about women being told to smile, that Supreme Court snuck up on all of us with that Hobby Lobby decision and now see where we are!
You see how that works? It's such a beneficial argument. We shudda been focused on the REAL issue but, no, we had to go and be silly. See what you got?
Now you go and fight, women!
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)A world where men think they can control women's facial expressions, is a world where men think they can control women's reproductive systems.
It's all woven together.
One feeds and builds a platform for the other.
The little "insignificant" things are the platform which allow the bigger thing to be built.
Seems pretty fucking obvious to me.
CTyankee
(65,358 posts)children (and some adults, unfortunately)...
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Squinch
(53,316 posts)Serves us uppities right!
CTyankee
(65,358 posts)besides, it isn't just specific to one post or one thread. It's very common. We just have to look at it and call it for what it is along with a good deal of SMH...
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)mansplaining again ...
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Unfortunately we'll be waiting another week or so for more of his witty mansplanations while he's in time out.
I am disappoint.
I just bet you are
CTyankee
(65,358 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)BainsBane
(54,982 posts)previously said the ruling was no big deal.
Because Scalia and co. Look to HOf before writing legal decisions. It's on p. 34, fn. 9.
CTyankee
(65,358 posts)she was nowhere to be seen the rest of the week. uh oh.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)"Those damn women in HoF complain about men telling them to smile. WELL THIS WILL SHOW THEM!!! Take THAT, HoF!!!"