History of Feminism
Related: About this forumIs it just me, or has it been...
A crazy couple days around here? Staying away from posting in a certain thread right now cause I am sure there are gonna be a fair amount of alerts.
ismnotwasm
(42,482 posts)Fall out from the hobby lobby ruling and embedded Libertarians around here is my guess
TDale313
(7,822 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)TDale313
(7,822 posts)Although it was pointed out that you can't serve on a jury for someone on your ignore list, so I try to keep my ignore list empty.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)TDale313
(7,822 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,482 posts)One because I'm convinced he's a troll and posts constant OP's, and the other for constant OP's. I should take one off again-- see if I can stand it
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I see the embedded Libertarians and those are being converted.
I keep thinking of the scene with Schwarzenegger where the kid says:
'It could be a tumor.'
To which Arnie says:
'It's NOT a tumor!'
Some don't yet know they are tumors, er, trolls...
The only troll I like. Have pictures of the family climbing up there. Good times.
kcr
(15,522 posts)If enough people put the bad posters on ignore, they'll skate through juries. It could explain why the mildest of attacks by good DUers are hidden while other egregious ones from trolls are allowed to stand. I see it too often not to wonder.
JI7
(90,941 posts)have remained.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)swarm originating here and hiding posts to make sure men aren't allowed to post anything anywhere, I notice feminists are always the ones getting hidden for far lesser offenses, and sometimes no offense at all, while misogynistic crap tends to stick around and stink.
Even though callout posts aren't particularly uncommon, I don't think I've seen anyone that wasn't a feminist get hidden for a post calling someone out in a while. Apparently being a feminist is enough to make linking to a thread someone posted an unbearable insult.
Squinch
(53,316 posts)under a different name, and survived a jury 5-2.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=46779
Proves the accuracy of your post.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)I'd call that hard evidence.
Squinch
(53,316 posts)Of course there was a poster who said that it didn't prove anything and it needed to be replicated (probably over and over) before it was worth talking about.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)So blatantly obvious, but no doubt thinks he's being oh so clever.