Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forum
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone have the results to this jury: (Original Post)
boston bean
Dec 2014
OP
hlthe2b
(107,002 posts)1. No... but that is beyond the pale
That some alert stalk in HOF is bad enough, but that goes even beyond that Stifling all discussion.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)2. The jury system is a failure
Racism and misogyny have become acceptable on this site, but calling those things out is hide worthy.
mercuryblues
(15,295 posts)3. funny that
chervilant
(8,267 posts)4. My IL has doubled
because the 'owners' of this site have routinely ignored or minimized concern about sexist terms like the one that's the subject of the OP that was hidden. I cannot understand this. I will never "understand" sexism and misogyny.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)5. my gosh, the effort to not challenge at all, the sexism on du. the jury so accommodating.
i waited until this morning to post on that thread. and fuckin hide...
fuck this shit. truly.
fuck it.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)6. LA should - and I hope they post the results to this one, too
JustAnotherGen
(33,894 posts)7. No - but did you know . . .
You can STILL recommend that OP. You can't respond to it - but I was just able to 'rec' it.
ismnotwasm
(42,484 posts)8. No
That's just fucked up
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)9. Fuck that. Posthumous rec for that OP.