Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,478 posts)
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:16 AM Aug 2015

GOP debate: Marco Rubio claims it’s in the Constitution that abortion should be illegal....

This man should be nowhere near politics. What a creep and an asshole.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio took the hardest of all possible hardline positions on the question of women’s rights Thursday night, arguing that abortions should be illegal even in cases of rape and incest.

“If you believe that life begins at conception, as you say you do,” she asked, “how do you justify ending a life just because it begins violently through no fault of the baby.”

“I don’t think that’s an accurate accounting of my view,” Rubio replied.

“You don’t favor a rape and incest exception?” Kelly asked.

“I have never said that,” Rubio replied. “I’ve never advocated that. I’ve advocated passing a law that says that all human life, at every stage of its development, is worthy of protection — in fact, I believe that law already exists.”

“It’s called the Constitution of the United States.”

http://www.salon.com/2015/08/07/gop_debate_marco_rubio_claims_its_in_the_constitution_that_abortion_should_be_illegal_even_in_cases_of_rape_and_incest/
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP debate: Marco Rubio claims it’s in the Constitution that abortion should be illegal.... (Original Post) ismnotwasm Aug 2015 OP
Just another hateful piece of shit. Also against helping some poor unwed Mom katmondoo Aug 2015 #1
They see things normal people don't liberal N proud Aug 2015 #2
So what article of the Constitution did this lawyer cite? TexasProgresive Aug 2015 #3
Pretty much Old Codger Aug 2015 #6
easy stomach. allan01 Aug 2015 #4
All are worthy of protection? And what happens when those judgements collide? DetlefK Aug 2015 #5
The "debate" was a charade cilla4progress Aug 2015 #7
A creep and an asshole brer cat Aug 2015 #8
And pundits had the gall to compare him to Obama YoungDemCA Aug 2015 #9
Ewwwwwwwww! ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #10
Not just him, they were tripping over each other to be the head asshole, that this party AuntPatsy Aug 2015 #11

katmondoo

(6,498 posts)
1. Just another hateful piece of shit. Also against helping some poor unwed Mom
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:22 AM
Aug 2015

He can go to hell with the rest of the creepy, selfish, mean, cruel Republicans.

TexasProgresive

(12,335 posts)
3. So what article of the Constitution did this lawyer cite?
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:26 AM
Aug 2015

“It’s called the Constitution of the United States.” is no valid argument.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
6. Pretty much
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:40 AM
Aug 2015

Their anything they wish to claim to be true irrespective of actual facts will be found in some part of their version of either the constitution or some bible somewhere..they will cherry pick some statement(usually only a small set of words ) totally out of context and say it means whatever they choose it to mean.

DetlefK

(16,496 posts)
5. All are worthy of protection? And what happens when those judgements collide?
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:31 AM
Aug 2015

How about death-penalties?
Or sending soldiers into war?
Or going to war in general?
How about insufficient medical care?
Or pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother?
Or environmental pollution?

And what does human "life" mean? Merely being alive? Or having legal rights? Like the freedom to make your own medical decisions for your own body?

cilla4progress

(25,983 posts)
7. The "debate" was a charade
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:04 AM
Aug 2015

Yes, some gotcha questions, but no follow-up and "candidates" were allowed to veer off into their stump speeches

brer cat

(26,511 posts)
8. A creep and an asshole
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 09:14 AM
Aug 2015

is perfect to describe Rubio. He has total contempt for our gender, and arrogantly believes that males are better at addressing and "fixing" issues relating to women. F@%# him.

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
11. Not just him, they were tripping over each other to be the head asshole, that this party
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:01 AM
Aug 2015

Still exists puts a serious stain on this country

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»GOP debate: Marco Rubio c...