Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Nuclear Free
Related: About this forumHarvey Wasserman - The rust-bucket nuclear reactors start to fall
The US fleet of 104 deteriorating atomic reactors is starting to fall. The much-hyped "nuclear renaissance" is now definitively headed in reverse.
The announcement that Wisconsin's Kewaunee will shut next year will be remembered as a critical dam break. Opened in 1974, Kewaunee has fallen victim to low gas prices, declining performance, unsolved technical problems and escalating public resistance.
Many old US reactors are still profitable only because their capital costs were forced down the public throat during deregulation, through other manipulations of the public treasury, and because lax regulation lets them operate cheaply while threatening the public health.
But even that's no longer enough. Dominion Energy wanted a whole fleet of reactors, then backed down and couldn't even find a buyer for Kewaunee. As the company put it: "the decision" to shut Kewaunee "was based purely on economics. Dominion was not able to move forward with our plan to grow our nuclear fleet in the Midwest to take advantage of economies of scale". Ironically, Kewaunee was recently given a license extension by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
...
http://freepress.org/columns/display/7/2012/1948The announcement that Wisconsin's Kewaunee will shut next year will be remembered as a critical dam break. Opened in 1974, Kewaunee has fallen victim to low gas prices, declining performance, unsolved technical problems and escalating public resistance.
Many old US reactors are still profitable only because their capital costs were forced down the public throat during deregulation, through other manipulations of the public treasury, and because lax regulation lets them operate cheaply while threatening the public health.
But even that's no longer enough. Dominion Energy wanted a whole fleet of reactors, then backed down and couldn't even find a buyer for Kewaunee. As the company put it: "the decision" to shut Kewaunee "was based purely on economics. Dominion was not able to move forward with our plan to grow our nuclear fleet in the Midwest to take advantage of economies of scale". Ironically, Kewaunee was recently given a license extension by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
...
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harvey Wasserman - The rust-bucket nuclear reactors start to fall (Original Post)
limpyhobbler
Oct 2012
OP
Also note that Dominion has abandoned their "Maine to Main" strategy from the last decade.
Throckmorton
Nov 2012
#1
How the heck do you get economies of scale by operating multiple reactors in a region?
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#2
Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)1. Also note that Dominion has abandoned their "Maine to Main" strategy from the last decade.
They are dumping lots of their plants (all types) outside of their traditional service area.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)2. How the heck do you get economies of scale by operating multiple reactors in a region?
Sharing a small pool of engineers between sites? Sharing a pool of emergency response materials between sites?
I can think of no 'economy of scale' here (aside from building NEW reactors, and building identical reactors, so you get some EOS from the foundry for the pressure vessels or something) that wouldn't be some kind of crazy trade-off on safety.