Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is the Supreme Court turning the Constitution into a homicide pact? (Original Post) GenXer47 Nov 2022 OP
Thomas would have been a keen mind on George III's Privy Council in 1700s. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #1
Not really atreides1 Nov 2022 #3
I wrote "mind" carefully, to avoid that leap to 1700s racism, but I failed. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #5
Ok Clarence..then you are property JT45242 Nov 2022 #2
FINE -- then ALL GUNS have to go back to that technology standard too. TigressDem Nov 2022 #4
Ugh, what these nutbag conservatve injustices are doing to this country is appalling. ShazzieB Nov 2022 #6

atreides1

(16,434 posts)
3. Not really
Wed Nov 30, 2022, 11:00 AM
Nov 2022

He would have been a servant...that George III regarded as less intelligent then his hunting dogs!!!

JT45242

(2,995 posts)
2. Ok Clarence..then you are property
Wed Nov 30, 2022, 10:50 AM
Nov 2022

If you want to go back to 1803. Clarence you are 3/5 of a person for the census and can be sold by your owner.

TigressDem

(5,126 posts)
4. FINE -- then ALL GUNS have to go back to that technology standard too.
Wed Nov 30, 2022, 11:14 AM
Nov 2022

DESTROY everything else.

ShazzieB

(18,927 posts)
6. Ugh, what these nutbag conservatve injustices are doing to this country is appalling.
Wed Nov 30, 2022, 03:15 PM
Nov 2022

Last edited Wed Nov 30, 2022, 06:16 PM - Edit history (2)

I guess Clarence has conveniently forgotten that a lot of the founders were enslavers who owned people like him as their property and wouldn't even have regarded him as a U.S. citizen, much less as their intellectual or social equal.

It's lucky for him that his ancestors were awarded the rights of citizenship via actual constitutional amendments, so he doesn't have to worry that they'll be snatched away from him by a rogue SCOTUS decision. Lucky, and also convenient. He can just keep merrily snatching away other people's rights without having to worry about his. The only thing that's possibly at risk for him is his marriage, and congress is in the process of fixing that.

It's a great time to be Clarence Thomas.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Is the Supreme Court turn...