Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumTrump REFUSES TO SIGN the Key Doc before SWEAR IN - Meidas Touch
Dont believe the headlines, Trumps transition is already illegal and he refuses to sign the key transition agreements to obtain top secret clearance for his team and him before he takes the oath of office, making the US vulnerable to a pandemic, cyber attack or war launched by our enemies as Trump takes the oath of office.
Michael Popok explains why Trump doesnt care about leaving his voters vulnerable while he and his Administration continues to print money on the way in. - 11/28/2024.
Meadowoak
(6,305 posts)kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)Meadowoak
(6,305 posts)kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)old. 3) been a US resident for the past 14 years and 4) not an insurrectionist
See Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: and 14th Amendment, Clause 3.
Thats it. Nothing about signing for a background check.
Meadowoak
(6,305 posts)kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)Montauk6
(8,780 posts)kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)Rhiannon12866
(224,855 posts)kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)order. Again, how does this make the US mare prone to a pandemic? Is global pandemic issues a 'top secret clearance' area anyway? Should it be?
Rhiannon12866
(224,855 posts)Sensitive information.
kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)keeping pandemic information from President Biden as well?
Again, why should pandemic information be subject to top secret clearance?
3825-87867
(1,161 posts)a special few. You might be surprised by what can be considered top secret. Oh, maybe YOU can't!
kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)3825-87867
(1,161 posts)Intel Briefings and "Top Secret" are not the same thing. Believe it or not, some of us have gone through that and know the difference.
And you can continue to believe that " his team can/will be given top secret clearance by executive order" because you know that is a fact!
Top Secret can be subjective, honest!!! But of course, you know better.
You might think SOME may be getting top secret clearence when YOU really don't know that they are or aren't. There are those (may be hard to believe) that can and will restrict "everything" because they KNOW the recipient can not or will not conform to requirements now or in the future. Information can or may be fed on a when and if "need to know only" basis.
If you believe the "executive" knows everything, you've been watching too many Bond movies.
But please continue to believe the Constitution is always followed by those in power or want to be even when you see the other side misusing it...but that's ok so long as "we" dont! Right?
Dave Bowman
(3,935 posts)Aussie105
(6,520 posts)He won't get 'top secret clearance' from countries around the world anyway.
kelly1mm
(5,427 posts)withhold intel from the USA that they already wouldn't have?
Skittles
(160,473 posts)tell me again why a fucking known national security threat can be PRESIDENT
Skittles
(160,473 posts)since when does he follow ANY fucking rules, signed or not?