Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

milestogo

(18,301 posts)
Sun Dec 15, 2024, 11:09 AM Dec 15

FFRF warns of far-reaching consequences after Supreme Court agrees to hear Catholic Charities case [View all]

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is sounding the alarm over the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear a case that could exempt a religiously affiliated nonprofit from unemployment insurance. The Supreme Court on Dec. 13 agreed to hear the Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission case. FFRF, a national state/church watchdog, had filed a friend-of-the-court brief before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which agreed with FFRF’s position that the Catholic Charities Bureau and its subsidiaries were not exempt from unemployment taxes.

The Catholic group — based out of Superior, Wis. — seeks to have several subsidiary nonprofits exempt from Wisconsin’s unemployment tax, claiming they should not pay unemployment tax, whether or not they provide religious services, because their work is religiously motivated. Yet the charities’ purposes are not to espouse the Catholic faith, staff don’t participate in religious services with clients, and some of the organizations don’t mention faith in their statements. And they don’t serve only Catholics.

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul urged the high court to stay out of the case because there was no authority split, also noting that the groups receive much of their funding from the public. FFRF’s friend-of-the-court brief urged the Wisconsin Supreme Court to keep the rights of workers in mind, such as countless Catholic hospital workers who could become ineligible to claim unemployment, even though their jobs have no religious functions. “The special exemption that the Catholic Charities Bureau is seeking would naturally extend to countless other nonprofits,” explains FFRF Senior Counsel Sam Grover. “Thousands of nonreligious employees at hospitals, colleges and other organizations could lose their unemployment coverage if the Supreme Court overturns the decision.”

Adds FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor: “The high court’s decision to take this case is alarming, and reveals its activist agenda. We’re witnessing an aggressive push by religious organizations to obtain special privileges that threaten to undermine the rights and freedoms of others, particularly vulnerable populations.” FFRF plans on filing a friend-of-the-court brief before the Supreme Court.

https://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-warns-of-far-reaching-consequences-after-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-catholic-charities-case/

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alarming doesn't begin to describe it. mountain grammy Dec 15 #1
Think of all the people who work for Catholic Charities milestogo Dec 15 #3
Who says they will not have a safety net? kirby Dec 15 #4
Really? milestogo Dec 15 #7
I hear you and you are correct... kirby Dec 15 #8
Alarming and appalling. The end result will be twofold. wnylib Dec 15 #10
SCOTUS is comprised of 6 Catholics and 1 former Catholic. Sneederbunk Dec 15 #2
Religious super PACs, here we come! Initech Dec 15 #5
Musk declares SpaceX a church Johonny Dec 15 #6
Time to revoke tax-exempt status for religious organizations, aka churches Wild blueberry Dec 15 #9
Time to revoke tax-exempt status for religious organizations, aka churches MLWR Dec 15 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #16
It never ceases to amaze how some SCOTUS judges, theoretically educated legal scholars, seem to have so little dlk Dec 15 #12
They comprehend it just fine. They just disagree with it so the choose to act as if it doesn't exist. Wiz Imp Dec 15 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #17
Agree 100% Wiz Imp Dec 15 #19
Their bloated level of entitlement is astounding dlk Dec 17 #27
What kind of shithole religious organization Geechie Dec 15 #13
Roman Catholicism milestogo Dec 15 #14
While not unemployment insurance... lonely bird Dec 15 #18
I've heard that the religious orders are "self-insured" also. milestogo Dec 15 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #21
Attacking Catholicism is apparently always acceptable here. It's like a hobby. Noel Kums Dec 15 #22
Yes, attacking Catholicism is always acceptable. It's a free country. muriel_volestrangler Dec 15 #23
Well said. milestogo Dec 15 #24
It isn't about attacking Catholicism lonely bird Dec 15 #25
"The high court's decision to take this case is alarming, and reveals its activist agenda." J_William_Ryan Dec 15 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FFRF warns of far-reachin...