Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

J_William_Ryan

(2,511 posts)

26. "The high court's decision to take this case is alarming, and reveals its activist agenda."

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Sun Dec 15, 2024, 05:26 PM

Dec 15

Indeed.

And this is just the beginning.

Expect the Trump Court overturn settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence – such as allowing mandatory Christian payer in public schools, allowing Christian icons and worship imagery in public schools and other government venues, eventually allowing the codification of an official state religion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FFRF warns of far-reaching consequences after Supreme Court agrees to hear Catholic Charities case [View all] milestogo Dec 15 OP

Alarming doesn't begin to describe it. mountain grammy Dec 15 #1

Think of all the people who work for Catholic Charities milestogo Dec 15 #3

Who says they will not have a safety net? kirby Dec 15 #4

Really? milestogo Dec 15 #7

I hear you and you are correct... kirby Dec 15 #8

Alarming and appalling. The end result will be twofold. wnylib Dec 15 #10

SCOTUS is comprised of 6 Catholics and 1 former Catholic. Sneederbunk Dec 15 #2

Religious super PACs, here we come! Initech Dec 15 #5

Musk declares SpaceX a church Johonny Dec 15 #6

Time to revoke tax-exempt status for religious organizations, aka churches Wild blueberry Dec 15 #9

Time to revoke tax-exempt status for religious organizations, aka churches MLWR Dec 15 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #16

It never ceases to amaze how some SCOTUS judges, theoretically educated legal scholars, seem to have so little dlk Dec 15 #12

They comprehend it just fine. They just disagree with it so the choose to act as if it doesn't exist. Wiz Imp Dec 15 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #17

Agree 100% Wiz Imp Dec 15 #19

Their bloated level of entitlement is astounding dlk Dec 17 #27

What kind of shithole religious organization Geechie Dec 15 #13

Roman Catholicism milestogo Dec 15 #14

While not unemployment insurance... lonely bird Dec 15 #18

I've heard that the religious orders are "self-insured" also. milestogo Dec 15 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 15 #21

Attacking Catholicism is apparently always acceptable here. It's like a hobby. Noel Kums Dec 15 #22

Yes, attacking Catholicism is always acceptable. It's a free country. muriel_volestrangler Dec 15 #23

Well said. milestogo Dec 15 #24

It isn't about attacking Catholicism lonely bird Dec 15 #25

"The high court's decision to take this case is alarming, and reveals its activist agenda." J_William_Ryan Dec 15 #26