Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In some states, the Democratic party's brand is so toxic, that it may be a good idea to run independent candidates [View all]Yavin4
(36,627 posts)4. They would have to fund their own campaigns.
No help at all from the DNC. Clean hands.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In some states, the Democratic party's brand is so toxic, that it may be a good idea to run independent candidates [View all]
Yavin4
Dec 15
OP
Do they want the Democratic Party and Democratic donors to help finance and support their run
Quiet Em
Dec 15
#1
I do not think the national has been doing much for some really good Arkansas candidates.
LiberalArkie
Dec 15
#35
Independents don't win unless they align with the party that dominates the state.
Self Esteem
Dec 15
#16
If the independent candidate is a strong progressive, then the Dems won't run an opposition candidate.
Yavin4
Dec 15
#48
When a billion-plus and an incredibly qualified presidential candidate doesn't do it, I don't know what will.
Noel Kums
Dec 15
#18
If the candidate refuses to pledge to caucus with Democrats, I always think it is a big deal risk that they may join
tritsofme
Dec 15
#40
In a Coke/Pepsi America telling people to vote for RC Cola is not good for the big brand.
ZonkerHarris
Dec 15
#41