Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

in2herbs

(3,231 posts)

2. Come January 3 Raskin will have no power to enforce his wishes because Ds will be

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2024, 06:11 PM

Dec 17

in the minority and the majority of Rs will do 45s bidding. The agreement 45 signed agreeing to background checks contained the clause that allowed his appointees to opt out of this requirement.

If Raskin wants background checks, order they be done NOW.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jamie Raskin demands FBI background checks for Trump nominees [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 17 OP

There need to be full FBI background checks on these nominees LetMyPeopleVote Dec 17 #1

Come January 3 Raskin will have no power to enforce his wishes because Ds will be in2herbs Dec 17 #2