Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Garland's Decisions For 2 Investigations [View all]hadEnuf
(2,796 posts)48. Oh, come on.
The fact is that no number of apologies is going to validate the slow walking and milquetoast handling of Republicans by Garland's DOJ.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Of course. They're doing secret things behind the scenes and it's not a Law & Order episode.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#58
So it is only for the people who disagree with you. Somehow, that doesn't surprise me at all.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#60
Are you talking about DOJ's non-public actions during the early part of the investigation?
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#62
Walk me through how Garland, or any AG of your choosing, could have circumvented the courts' obstruction
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#70
If you've been here since 2003, surely you've seen the pushback on gab's Garland bashing
Fiendish Thingy
Monday
#14
Fact. We are now on the road to a fascist dictatorship. Fact. The actual criminals now have full power and have
hadEnuf
Tuesday
#45
Sorry, Garland concentrated on putting away a few small fish while trying not to look "political" to the big fish.
hadEnuf
Tuesday
#61
Too bad you weren't around to advise the civil rights leaders when they called out injustices in the 50's and 60's.
58Sunliner
Tuesday
#49
If Biden felt it was such a mistake to pick Garland, why didn't he fire him a couple of years ago?
TheRickles
Monday
#17
Because it would have looked awful with a pending investigation against Hunter.
SunSeeker
Monday
#21
If you think about that question in terms of political reality, you'll have your answer
Orrex
Tuesday
#71
He could have urged Garland to retire in order to spend more time with him family.....
TheRickles
Tuesday
#73
I was a Garland supporter for the first year or two. What a major, total disappointment he is, even derelict.
MLAA
Monday
#29