General Discussion

uponit7771

(92,046 posts)

64. Marilyn Mosby her FA testified he cleared her for the transaction and DOJ still prosecuted ...

Reply to reACTIONary (Reply #49)

Wed Dec 25, 2024, 11:58 AM

Wednesday

...cause they left the belief up to the jury

The DOJ does prosecute cases with weaker evidence

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The real reason Garland did not charge Gaetz. [View all] Hamlette Tuesday OP

I am surprised that the Mann Act's application cyclonefence Tuesday #1

+1 crickets Tuesday #5

Caminetti vs United States (1917) H2O Man Tuesday #14

Gaetz report renews debate about how he escaped federal charges Wiz Imp Tuesday #22

Right. H2O Man Tuesday #51

Not what I said Hamlette Wednesday #58

How dare you! Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2

It's a shame that smug condescension can't be harnessed as a power source. Orrex Tuesday #6

I'm angry and frustrated too Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #20

The only allegation of rape.. reACTIONary Tuesday #26

WHY CAN'T I REC THIS 100X?? WarGamer Tuesday #12

This member of the reality based community thanks you for your support. Nt Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #21

But Hunter yankee87 Tuesday #3

Because Garland has an agenda. Beastly Boy Tuesday #4

The report says the Justice Department stonewalled the committee's requests Zorro Tuesday #7

So? If the DOJ had hard evidence... reACTIONary Tuesday #28

The real reason Bird Lady Tuesday #8

That's right. Garland should have just made shit up about Gaetz and charged him anyway. Wiz Imp Tuesday #10

Thanks! Keep speaking truth to... reACTIONary Tuesday #29

thanks. really appreciate your efforts here. stopdiggin Tuesday #36

It could just be a reflection of your insanity? Bird Lady Tuesday #50

Thank You Wiz Imp Tuesday #9

The report is not exhaustive of moniss Tuesday #16

The reason they refused to cooperate with the committee is simple and straightforward... reACTIONary Tuesday #35

Everything DOJ did was not moniss Tuesday #39

The grand jury is an example of the general principle... reACTIONary Tuesday #41

For heaven's sake moniss Tuesday #43

They stonewalled the committee.... reACTIONary Tuesday #44

It was not as complete or extensive of his wrongdoing as it moniss Tuesday #46

It's simple.... reACTIONary Tuesday #48

We're not talking about the half hearted questionable moniss Tuesday #52

Do I understand? You seem to think that.... reACTIONary Tuesday #53

No you don't understand and moniss Tuesday #54

There is still the drug charges moniss Tuesday #11

when did the possession of cocaine occur? Hamlette Wednesday #59

I don't know about the possession details per se only that moniss Wednesday #61

Mann act is a federal crime and there was enough evidence to arrest him for it uponit7771 Tuesday #13

There was absolutely no chance of ever getting a conviction Wiz Imp Tuesday #18

That was up to the jury not forum posters uponit7771 Tuesday #34

No. That was up to the lawyers who know when they have an unwinnable case . Wiz Imp Tuesday #40

As a matter of justice, you do not prosecute a person.... reACTIONary Tuesday #49

Marilyn Mosby her FA testified he cleared her for the transaction and DOJ still prosecuted ... uponit7771 Wednesday #64

They shouldn't. reACTIONary Wednesday #65

"The White Slave Traffic Act of 1910", you mean? AZJonnie Tuesday #45

That's how I look at it. The women were hookers who were compensated... JohnnyRingo Tuesday #15

But is this the only time he delved into underaged females? paleotn Tuesday #23

Your sense of the matter wouldn't be ... reACTIONary Tuesday #25

My sense of the matter might lead to paths of investigation that turn up evidence that's admissible. paleotn Tuesday #31

The "paths of investigation" were pursued by the DOJ, and... reACTIONary Tuesday #37

You have a point there. JohnnyRingo Tuesday #55

Now that image of her being statuary is stuck in my mind BeyondTheVeilJack Tuesday #24

hahaha oops! JohnnyRingo Tuesday #56

Yeah, no. There was plenty of evidence to charge him. W_HAMILTON Tuesday #17

From The Guardian ... AZJonnie Wednesday #57

Convenient of them to leave out the rest of the statute: W_HAMILTON Wednesday #67

To me it's pretty clear that the intent of the statute is AZJonnie Thursday #69

Drugs? So is blow now de rigueur in House offices? paleotn Tuesday #19

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Tuesday #27

Not if the prosecutors never get past a preliminary hearing Beastly Boy Wednesday #63

What a poor persecuted guy Garland is. nt LexVegas Tuesday #30

doggonit now. you're just dashing cold water on a really good hissy fit! stopdiggin Tuesday #32

How about his dead roommate Mr. Garland? They made the arresting officer resign! GreenWave Tuesday #33

Because it would look political, unlike Hunter Biden. usonian Tuesday #38

nly one thing more sick than a child rapist Emile Tuesday #42

Now let's chat about all the other people he let off the hook Blue_Tires Tuesday #47

the tragedy about our disagreements here is we are not talking about why this report is so damaging Hamlette Wednesday #60

It WAS a Mann act violation. DiverDave Wednesday #62

It was not a violation of the Mann Act. Hamlette Wednesday #66

That's not a very good defense. W_HAMILTON Wednesday #68